Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S."
Results 721 - 740
of 182,201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2018, 1:00 am
Interesting research coming out. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 2:19 am
There was no dispute in T’s case that she needed secure accommodation. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:30 am
Most plans still use the PPO model, so there's at least some level of coverage, albeit with substantially greater out of pocket. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:17 am
We don’t know.'" [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 1:46 pm
The appellate court disagreed with the father’s argument regarding the best interest attorney and on most issues upheld the lower court’s order. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
I find this decision interesting because it shows that there are disclaimer-transmitted diseases (DTD): a disclaimer may transmit a deficiency such as a lack of clarity from the disclaimed prior art to the claim comprising the disclaimer.The appeal was directed against the decision of the Opposition Division to revoke the patent.Claim 1 before the Board read (in English translation):The use of an adhesive tape having a tape-like backing of non-woven material, which is coated on at least one… [read post]
11 May 2010, 3:02 pm
Furthermore, it may be transferred or assigned to a third party as part of the opponent’s business assets, together with the assets in the interests of which the opposition was filed (see G 4/88). [read post]
3 Oct 2006, 2:40 pm
I suppose this is an interesting way of fighting the war on terrorism: feed detainees lots of food and limit their exercise so they get fat and can't fight effectively anymore. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:43 pm
I haven’t read it yet, but I certainly will soon. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 7:12 pm
It's interesting to know that U.S. technically doesn't have an official language. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 3:22 am
We weren’t the government’s favorite people, and made some enemies along the way. [read post]
15 May 2010, 11:02 am
Readers interested in ‘surprising’ new case law only should not read on as the present decision is not of the surprising kind. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:19 am
If you sign a division order and it turns out that your interest is less than the interest shown on the division order, you are legally obligated to pay back the money that you weren’t entitled to. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 1:00 am
I still don't quite believe the rationale behind IRC 4943. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 12:24 am
Santa Barbara does for the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell debate. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:03 pm
” This is a far cry from the old me, who was only interested in baseball and playing guitar. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 12:11 am
“I don’t know. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 5:01 am
In Don’t Tax the Rich. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 7:49 am
One, it tells us that prosecutors aren’t the only ones who can use the statement against penal interest exception. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 3:57 pm
When this happens, it usually doesn’t matter how good of a deal you got, here's why: [read post]
