Search for: "INFORRM"
Results 721 - 740
of 882
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2012, 5:08 pm
Preview at Theatre 503, 503 Battersea Park Road, London, Monday 16 June 2012 Athalie Matthews is a media law associate at Bindmans LLP and the Inforrm Reviews editor. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:11 pm
There was an Inforrm post about this. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 1:40 am
If you want to find out more about last week’s legal news, why not read the Latest Human Rights Law Developments in the UK by the LAwThink Blog, or if you want to know what went on in the Leveson Inquiry, read the Inforrm’s Blog roundup of week 6 of the proceedings here. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:55 am
Max Mosley has been unsuccessful in his long running campaign to compel the English press to give advance notice of threatened invasions of privacy. [read post]
14 Oct 2016, 4:07 pm
HHJ Luba QC’s County Court judgment in Brown v The Commissioner of Police for Metropolis and another (discussed in a recent Inforrm post) lends further support to this view. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:21 pm
On 17 and 18 January 2017, a seven judge Supreme Court will hear the claimant’s appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal in the case of PNM v Times Newspapers ([2014] EWCA Civ 1132). [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 5:50 pm
There is an Inforrm case comment and one from the RPC Privacy Blog. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 4:02 pm
Comment Preliminary issue hearings on meaning have become common place (see previous Inforrm posts here and here). [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
Inforrm had a post by Brian Cathcart. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:00 am
In last week’s judgment in the case of Bou Malhab v Diffusion Métromedia CMR Inc (2011 SCC 9) the Supreme Court of Canada refused to permit a “class action” for libel by Arabic and Creole speaking Montreal taxi drivers who had been subjected to racist and abusive coments by Andre Arthur, a “shock jock” (turned MP)(pictured right) in the course of a radio broadcast. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:55 pm
OPQ v BJM [2011] EWHC 1059 (QB - Read judgment The case of OPQ v BJM addresses one of the most difficult practical issues in privacy law and adopts a novel solution. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm
We had a post about the response on Inforrm. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:07 pm
The Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights forcefully reiterated the importance of freedom of expression in the political sphere in the case of Axel Springer AG v Germany (No.2) ([2014] ECHR 745)(French only). [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 8:06 am
Roy Greenslade gives three cheers for the Bill, the Libel Reform Campaign has given the Bill a cautious welcome, Legal Week comments that it contains few surprises and little radicalism, and Inforrm’s blog concludes that it is mostly harmless. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 4:55 pm
A former print journalist, he now contributes to online publications such as Inforrm, Byline Times and openDemocracy. [read post]
16 May 2011, 1:48 am
Judith Townend wrote an insightful post on the incident for the Inforrm’s Blog, which contained opinions from media lawyers and experts, and also links to many of the articles featured in newspapers and law blogs alike. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 5:08 am
Please let Inforrm know: inforrmeditorial@gmail.com. [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
The decision is a surprising and retrograde one in the light of the recent Grand Chamber decision in Morice v France (see the Inforrm case comment). [read post]
