Search for: "In Interest of LJ"
Results 721 - 740
of 980
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2021, 4:25 pm
The appeal against the striking out of the defence of public interest was allowed. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 5:10 pm
On 16 March 2021 the Court of Appeal (Vos MR, Sharp P, Warby LJ) heard an appeal in the case of Millett v Corbyn. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
[The italics are as inserted by Wilson LJ for his emphasis]. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:48 am
In relation to the first obviousness attack - the Agrevo attack - Contour cited Jacob LJ's comment in Dr. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am
”[1] Whilst a public consultation has been held in the UK, resulting in no immediate recommendations for changes in the current patent legislation, with these interesting policy issues seemingly unresolved and the continued advancement of AI, we expect this will not be the last we hear on this topic. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 2:25 am
Further, section 397 and 398 are intended to avoid winding up of the company if possible and keep it going while at the same time relieving in minority shareholders from acts of oppression and mismanagement or preventing its affairs being conducted in a manner prejudicial to public interest and, if that be the objective, the court must have power to interfere with he normal corporate management of the company, and to supplant the entire corporate management, or rather, mismanagement, by… [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 4:13 pm
The disctinction is false becasue it concerns the tenancy, not the partial interest of any individual in the tenancy. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 10:29 am
In the Court of Appeal Ward LJ thought this was not a precedent fact case because he viewed the question as whether a person was a "child in need". [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
Lord Carnwath was not convinced by arguments about the importance of keeping the cases before the IPT protected in the interests of national security; he was satisfied that the Administrative Division of the High Court is capable of putting in place sufficient protections to ensure that sensitive information is protected [112]. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 7:29 am
Whilst this case was limited to the issue of jurisdiction, Lord Briggs made a number of interesting comments on the substantive issue of parent company liability which will be before the court for determination when this matter eventually goes to trial. [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm
” I could not possibly find that the judge was not entitled to conclude that the benefits to the local community arising from the occupation of the defendants were not enough to preclude the landowner seeking to vindicate his ownership rights to the immediate return of his property.Lord Toulson and Lloyd LJ agreed that on the facts of the case, the Judge was right to make an immediate possession order.Where there was dissent was on the issue of the application of Art 8 and the rule in… [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
The parties are directly adverse in interests. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:00 am
The judge then had to consider two interesting questions of causation. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
The FLSC and individual law societies have an essential role in vigorously safeguarding the proper administration of justice in the public interest. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:00 am
As Mummery LJ also said; as for those who complain about the time taken and the legal costs and other expenses and losses incurred, I think that they would want the hearings to be conducted in the interests of justice to both sides. [read post]
22 May 2012, 2:30 am
Two other points are of interest. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:43 pm
The outcome of the appeal will be interesting for the guidance it will provide on both these important issues – which affect the media on a regular basis. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 5:53 pm
Learn More” Chris Pounder has an interesting post on his Hawktalk blog entitled “Google lost its two recent Court cases for the same reason the one-stop shop does not work”. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 2:15 am
The political rights, Article 8 – 12, with the right set out in the first part and the derogation in the second, create a structure which means that a very large number of legal debates is about how the balance between private right and public interest should be struck. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 12:45 am
Notable also for LJ McFarlane's postscript on the responsibilities of parents in children disputes, that I set out in this post, and Marilyn Stowe also mentioned - see below. [read post]
