Search for: "In Re Kerr"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2012, 4:48 pm
(Orin Kerr) Having read Judge Reinhardt’s opinion in Perry v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 1:49 pm
leave it to the know nothing know it all lawyers to think they’re better than you. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 2:10 pm
Allen Ann Bartow Kristin Eschenfelder Edward Felten Ian Kerr Jaron Lanier Paul Ohm Hector Postigo Ted Striphas Valerie Steeves Michael Zimmer In the meanwhile, get your copy of the book and mark your calendars! [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 3:26 pm
(Orin Kerr) I posted a reader poll yesterday on the video of the U.S. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:59 pm
They’re generalists, not Fourth Amendment nerds. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:19 am
(Orin Kerr) If you’re interested in developments in computer crime law, check out Cybercrime Review, a very useful blog on new cases and other developments in the field. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 12:17 pm
As Orin Kerr pointed out at the Volokh Conspiracy, Scalia's majority opinion articulated a new test for what constitutes a search, reaching back to historic court precedents based on property rights as opposed to modern jurisprudence based on a "reasonable expectation of privacy," first articulated in the Katz decision in 1967. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:30 am
To prove my pain in this regard, I note that Orin Kerr at Volokh reached the same conclusion, and you know how much I hate to agree with Orin.Though the decision is sound under existing law, it gnaws at me for two reasons. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 10:33 am
(Orin Kerr) I blogged a lot about this topic a few years ago when the Boucher case was pending; although an appeal was filed in that case in the First Circuit, the appeal was dropped so the appellate court never decided it. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 9:05 am
(See Margot Kaminski, Paul Ohm, Howard Wasserman, Tom Goldstein, and the terrifyingly prolific Orin Kerr.) [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
Kerr: You’re up. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:32 pm
(Orin Kerr) You’re no doubt familiar with this Term’s Supreme Court case involving a constitutional challenge to an “unprecedented” recent federal law. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 5:29 am
Here’s my question: If you’re an originalist, does that mean that you think the Constitution guarantees the civil remedies that existed at common law for search and seizure violations? [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 11:30 am
Here’s my question: If you’re an originalist, does that mean that you think the Constitution guarantees the civil remedies that existed at common law for search and seizure violations? [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:40 pm
(Orin Kerr) Originalists are often opposed to the exclusionary rule, the rule that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment cannot be used in court. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm
Ed. 2d 562 (1974).In re Oliver, 68 S. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 4:51 am
“When we changed that, the sex offender population was like, “They're coming out to my home? [read post]
28 Dec 2011, 1:00 am
Grant, 2009 SCC 32 Kerr v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 3:33 am
We're told you hate it. [read post]
