Search for: "In Re Opinions of the Justices" Results 721 - 740 of 12,656
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 8:31 am by velvel
March 15, 2010Judge Lifland’s Opinion On Net Equity. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm by Joseph Margulies
I fully recognize that this is not a representative sampling of public opinion. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:03 am by NCC Staff
Among the more prominent of those opinions were Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 2:33 pm
  Which, of course, is what you'd fully expect 'em to do if the math error was in her favor.Regardless, in the end, the Court of Appeal affirms, and (belatedly) publishes the opinion to boot. [read post]
24 May 2007, 4:25 pm
I agree with the majority opinion (written by Justice Bamattre-Manoukian) in this one. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:11 pm
One of the things I like most about the California Supreme Court is that, busy as they are, they're not too busy to occasionally engage in pure error review; e.g., to grant review of the occasional unpublished opinion that's really wrong. [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:44 pm
This month's installment, titled Abbreviated Justice, discussed memorandum opinions in California appellate practice. [read post]
24 May 2023, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
The post Re-Imagining the Notion of “Pride” in the Legal Profession appeared first on Slaw. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The recent decision of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the case of TU, RE v Google LLC ([2022] EUECJ C-460/20) answered two questions referred to it by the German court regarding the delisting of results generated by search engines on the basis that they contain inaccurate information. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:09 am by library
Whether its Justice John Paul Stevens sporting a golf club to represent his majority opinion in PGA Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:19 am
Though two Justices tried hard in separate opinions to ease the impact of the Supreme Court's rulng Monday on high-speed police chases, the fact remains that the main opinion had the unqualified support of six Justices and did lay down a hard-and-fast constitutional rule. [read post]