Search for: "In Re Ss"
Results 721 - 740
of 845
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2009, 3:22 pm
Such was the case in these joined applications; the defendants contended that judicial review was excluded by ss.1(3) and 3(5) of the 2007 Act. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 4:49 am
Such Orders are the constitutional equivalent of Acts of the Assembly, and the Northern Ireland courts refused to become involved in review processes that would have led them to consider the underlying policy of particular Orders (see, for instance, Re Carter’s Application [2011] NIQB 15). [read post]
1 May 2023, 6:30 pm
Das entspricht dem Ansatz der Koregulierung, gemäss welchem das Gesetz ausgestaltet ist. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 3:21 pm
” The 1934 Act began a pattern that has troubled regulation of electronic communications privacy ever since: the re-use of old statutory language in new contexts. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:11 am
In examining this question, Lord Justice Richards considered case law on the meaning of ‘poor’ in Re Resch’s Will Trusts [1969] 1 AC 514 and on the extent of public benefit required in R (Independent Schools Council) v Charity Commission [2011] UKUT 421. [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:43 pm
The costs provisions in ss. 258.5 and 258.6 do not address those risks, but instead address the failure to meet the specific obligations identified in those provisions. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 10:29 am
This claim is based on ss.296ZF(1) and 296ZA of the 1988 CDPA. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
You mean we’re going to get rid of the starred care plan? [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 12:40 pm
März 2020 und stützt sich erwartungsgemäss auf Art. 77 [recte: 7] des Epidemiengesetzes (EpG) zur ausserordentlichen Lage. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:21 pm
The Bill does state, “nothing in this Act derogates from a health care provider’s or religious health care organization’s obligations to their patients, which may include informing individuals of options in respect of receiving a health care service” (ss.2(2)). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:13 pm
FIO Act 2000, ss 12 (cost of compliance), 16 (duty to assist): Martin Brighton v IC EA/2010/0114. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:23 pm
The appropriate remedy was to interfere with the legislative scheme as little as possible, with “a declaration that the application of ss. 21(1) to (3) and related sections of FIPPA pertaining to the presumption of non-disclosure of “personal information” to Adjudicative Records held by the remaining institutions named in the Notice of Application infringes s. 2(b) of the Charter and is not justified under s. 1. [read post]
22 Sep 2019, 9:15 pm
» Und: «Es besteht gemäss den deutschen Behörden deshalb ein hohes Sicherheitsrisiko, denn dieser Frontabschnitt der social medias [sic!] [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Criminal Law: Jury Instructions re HomicideR. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 8:42 am
Suwanee Fruit & SS Steamship Co., in which a sailor half-blinded in a pre-employment accident sued his employer for total disability when he lost the sight in his second eye. [read post]
22 May 2009, 11:01 pm
RF Hunter Pence (13 RCAA/.414 OBA/.527 SLG/.941 OPS) has picked up from his hot finish to last season, and SS Miguel Tejada (3 RCAA/.353 OBA/.485 SLG/.837 OPS) -- who finished last season as one of the poorest-producing regular players in MLB -- is off to a good start to this season. [read post]
1 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
And last but not least, one from a consistory court… Re the Rustat Memorial, Jesus College, Cambridge [2022] ECC Ely 2: Tobias Rustat (1607/8-1694), an alumnus and major benefactor of the College, had also been an investor in the Company of Royal Adventurers Trading into Africa and in its successor, the Royal African Company, of which he had been a director. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 1:49 pm
Will the imposition of explicit criteria re “competitive market” and “public interest” cause more mischief, costs and need for protracted and expensive evidence from so-called experts? [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 12:14 pm
” In re Int’l Admin. [read post]
2 Oct 2022, 9:00 pm
Immerhin bestätigt der EDÖB mit diesen Aussagen, dass die (naheliegende) Vermutung, die Frage der Angemessenheit gemäss europäischer Datenschutz-Grundverordnung (DSGVO), beeinflusse die Beurteilung, zutreffend ist. [read post]
