Search for: "In re: Peer Review Action."
Results 721 - 740
of 926
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2011, 8:04 am
Editors of peer-reviewed journals would no longer have to worry about whether they could afford to publish articles with a real public interest, such as in scientific debates (drugs policy, for example). [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am
Recently, a blind peer reviewer for a law journal to which I’d submitted a manuscript included the following comment, among others, in rejecting my article for publication: “Since when is ‘because it’s the right thing to do’ a legal reason to do anything? [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am
Recently, a blind peer reviewer for a law journal to which I’d submitted a manuscript included the following comment, among others, in rejecting my article for publication: “Since when is ‘because it’s the right thing to do’ a legal reason to do anything? [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm
This paper investigates peer-to-peer file sharing networks and the challenge they represent to existing intellectual property regimes. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:31 am
Similarly, members of the military undertake after action reviews. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 5:31 am
Somewhere along the way, between GeoCities and Facebook, all of this changed.Way back when, like two, maybe three years ago, I referred to the blawgosphere as peer-reviewed. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 11:38 am
Although the First Amendment limits government censorship, it does not limit most private action. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Problem: peer review can hinder change, blocking dissemination of novel ideas; this can carry over into patent law. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 4:18 am
Benson is a ‘failure’ (271 Patent Blog) Second peer-to-patent pilot phase has begun – UK-IPO might join later (IP:JUR) First Action Pendency and RCEs drop in October (Director’s Forum) USPTO plans to extend ‘Green Technology Pilot Program’ (IPBiz) UPDATE: Investigating patent law’s presumption of validity (Patently-O) US Patents – Decisions CAFC removes limitations on new evidence in §145 Civil Actions against USPTO:… [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:04 am
We’re always glad to have people over to visit so grab a piping hot spiced latte and we’ll see what’s been going on around the blogosphere. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
Each is re-cast in statutory form. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am
– Watching your pre-action steps (PatLit) The advertising wars of Kellogg’s corn fakes (IPKat) UK intellectual property insurance services: ten or more? [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:19 am
MI6 chief: we have nothing to do with torture Guardian: Sir John Sawers talks of dilemma between protecting Britain and using intelligence drawn from tortured terrorist suspects “If we know or believe action by us will lead to torture taking place, we’re required by UK and international law to avoid that action, and we do, even though that allows that terrorist activity to go ahead. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 11:10 am
The reviewers "did not have any information about the basis for agency action in individual cases, so were not in a position to assess whether the conduct of the employee merited the action taken, and whether appropriate standards were used to make decisions, or the reasons for managers' decisions on personnel matters," Giles wrote. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 8:06 am
No matter how trivial the action, he always said please and thank you. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:31 am
Once the peer-review begins, it will continue for a three-month period. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:52 am
In In re Tayeb, the Appellant, a physical therapist, treated a young Australian woman and under the pretense of treatment performed an indecent act. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 12:40 pm
A growing list with details is available at the Open Access at Duke web site but, in brief, here are the key initiatives: - adoption of a policy that sets the default to open access for all peer-reviewed journal articles published by Duke faculty. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:12 am
Attorneys who attend this webinar will learn about: The greatest challenge your writing must overcome to persuade readers to take a desired action Basic concepts underlying all effective persuasive writing—ignore these and you’re sunk How to write a compelling brief that the judge just can’t put down The role of emotion in jurisprudence and how to trigger the reader’s emotions The things readers absolutely hate—and how to avoid them How to deal with… [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 9:11 am
Borgida engaged in what is called a “social framework analysis,” which “uses general conclusions from tested, reliable, and peer-reviewed social science research as a context for educating fact finders about the case facts at hand. [read post]
