Search for: "In re Blake"
Results 721 - 740
of 931
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2009, 6:00 am
If you’re interested in reading the book, you can order it here. [read post]
11 May 2011, 8:06 am
Then again, we’re talking about BlackRock, Inc. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 3:52 am
Ice completely undercuts Foster’s finding that Ohio’s law on consecutive sentencing violated Blakely. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 3:21 am
At least we’re sure they are now. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Olson, The Excuse Factory 220–21 (1997). [2] See Volokh, supra note *. [3] See, e.g., Michael Blake, The Discriminating Shopper, 43 San Diego L. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 2:24 pm
Del. 2008); In re Blakely, 363 B.R. 225, 2230 (Bankr. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 2:45 pm
Granted, they’re not cheap, but they’re worth it. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:18 am
The 1st Circuit, though, decided that Blakely v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
This wasn’t a Blakely issue; that case doesn’t even get mentioned until the concurring opinion, and really was a question of construction of a Federal statute. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 6:08 pm
In re F5 Networks, Inc. [read post]
8 Aug 2009, 2:58 am
He purchased his shirt from a virulent fringe website.For example, here is a poem that is featured on the site that sells Stan's shirt:The thought police are coming they're coming for meI thought this was the land, the land of the free? [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 2:01 pm
Greenberg Traurig: We're Built for Change (SM) Haynes Boone: Setting Precedent (SM) Holland & Knight: Industry focused. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 10:01 pm
If you’re looking for a read that will get your brain going, check out the Pew Research Center’s “14 striking findings from 2014. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 9:14 am
One of the Wake Forest deans (we’re not sure if it was Dean Blake Morant or one of the school’s associate deans) did respond to the entire law school community about this student: Dear Law School Community: I have received an anonymous email message that disparages the law school and is replete with untruths and inaccuracies. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm
Paul Schabas and Jon Goheen, of Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP, Toronto and Vancouver, Canada. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Permits member states to require re-investment of streaming revenue locally. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Constitutional Faith and Veneration, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 8:35 am
One way to describe his project, I think, is that he wants to re-center existing narratives about state-building before the New Deal, moving material that those narratives place at the periphery to the core. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 10:36 am
But the courts have seen the smoke, the mirrors, and the strings – and they’re simply not buying it. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
National/Federal A Trump Hotel Mystery: Giant reservations followed by empty rooms Politico – Anita Kumar | Published: 10/2/2019 House investigators are looking into an allegation that groups, including at least one foreign government, tried to ingratiate themselves to President Trump by booking rooms at his hotels but never staying in them. [read post]
