Search for: "In re INITIATIVE PETITION NO. 9" Results 721 - 740 of 871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
Between Miller and Heller: The Second Amendment in the Modern EraChapter 9. [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 10:02 am by Law Lady
., Appellee. 2nd District.Child support -- Child custody -- Intervention -- Where Department of Revenue initiated proceedings to establish paternity and require father to pay medical support and child support; father filed petition seeking custody of child and child support from child's mother; custody petition was transferred to a new lower court case number; mother and father ultimately entered into agreement providing that father would consent to termination of… [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am by Florian Mueller
It also puts Judge Alsup at loggerheads with the U.S. government, which found Google's cert petition flawed and recommended its rejection last year. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:47 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Baker Hughes then filed an application to compel arbitration of the license and release issue before the mediator and a petition for declaratory judgment. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:03 am
– Brdo: (IPR-Helpdesk), 5-6 June: USFDA public meeting on evaluation of product trade names: (FDA Law Blog), 9-12 June: (US) Strategies for management of IP – Chicago: (IPR-Helpdesk), 11 June: MARQUES ‘First meeting with Spanish Judges of the Community Trade Mark Courts’ – Alicante: (Class 46), 16 June / 1 July: US PLI: ‘Prior art & obviousness 2008: The PTO and CAFC perspective on patent law sections 102 &… [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
., the individual's date of initial permanent appointment in public service.For example, assume Employee A was provisionally appointed on January 1, and Employee B was appointed February 1, of the same year. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm by John Elwood
Back then, the Supreme Court denied the petition without even relisting it. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 6:36 am
According to media reports, the new Union Cabinet is said to have approved the proposal for promulgating these twin Ordinances in its initial meetings. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:58 am by SOIssues
Five percent of sex offenders who did end up in prison again were returned for new sex crimes, 9 percent went back for other crimes and 86 percent returned for parole violations. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:58 am by SOIssues
Five percent of sex offenders who did end up in prison again were returned for new sex crimes, 9 percent went back for other crimes and 86 percent returned for parole violations. [read blog]
6 Mar 2008, 12:19 pm by Thornhill Law Firm, APLC
The articles on digital evidence presume that the digital evidence can be clearly identifiable as the original when in fact it is seldom that digital evidence is not changed to the extent that it is automatically re-formatted on the recipient machine. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 11:24 pm by Andres
York, director of the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), an organization defending civil liberties in the digital world, posted on her Twitter account the following message: We know petitions won’t convince Syria (or anyone) but it’s all we’ve got. [read post]
Petition for review after the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal in an action for writ of administrative mandate. [read post]