Search for: "In re McConnell" Results 721 - 740 of 1,059
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2012, 1:14 pm by LindaMBeale
  See Lori Montgomery, McConnell pulls back from filibuster on Senate tax-cut vote, Washington Post, July 25, 2012. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
  We’re about to witness what is all but certain to be the most expensive presidential election in the history of the world. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 6:25 am by Mandelman
  We’re about to witness what is all but certain to be the most expensive presidential election in the history of the world. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 7:29 am by Glenn Reynolds
EUGENE VOLOKH: “If you’re interested in becoming a law professor, you should consider applying for a two-year Stanford Constitutional Law Center Academic Fellowship; two fellowships are being filled this year, for July 2013 to June 2015. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 10:20 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) If you’re interested in becoming a law professor, you should consider applying for a two-year Stanford Constitutional Law Center Academic Fellowship; two fellowships are being filled this year, for July 2013 to June 2015. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 1:37 pm
Mitch McConnell AND this TAX INCREASE needs to be repealed Original content copyright © InsureBlog [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm by Mark Tushnet
This post is going to get pretty deep in the weeds, and unless you're a real fanatic you might want to skip it.The evidence that the initial conference vote was 5-4 to strike down the ACA is pretty strong. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 12:39 pm by Zoe Tillman
As Landry and other Republican lawmakers spoke, supporters of the law standing nearby chanted, "Yes we will," and called for Obama's re-election in the fall. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:35 pm by Sandy Levinson
And I believe McConnell correctly believes that Ted Kennedy elected George W. [read post]
25 May 2012, 6:53 am by Sam Bagenstos
Now Professor McConnell can agree or disagree with these arguments. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
Illinois has criminalized the nonconsensual recording of most any oral communication, including recordings of public officials doing the public’s business in public and regardless of whether the re cording is open or surreptitious. [read post]
4 May 2012, 3:13 am by Guest Blogger
When courts defer in this manner to outcomes of legislative debates, rather than re-enacting the drama, the factiousness of the legislative process recedes -- or at least it should. [read post]