Search for: "In re Special Justice"
Results 721 - 740
of 8,554
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2015, 3:30 pm
SOURCE: TEXAS SUPREME COURT - 13-0928 - IN RE STEVEN LIPSKY [Opinion by Justice Divine in pdf] - 4/24/2015 CITATION: In re Lipsky, No. 13-0928, ___ S.W.3d ___ (Tex. 2015) COA OPINION BELOW: In re Lipsky, 411 S.W.3d 530 (Tex.App. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 5:36 am
The administration might want to keep her in reserve should Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 85, leave the court..... [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 12:56 am
The Civil Justice Council has published a report on Access to Justice for Litigants in Person. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 5:49 am
(Here is the latest edition of the Institute for Justice’s weekly Short Circuit newsletter, written by John Ross.) [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:12 am
After all, they’re the judges, and judges are, of course, special. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm
In the charged rhetoric about Latino immigration our national conversation could benefit from re-imagining our unalienable rights. [read post]
20 May 2019, 2:22 pm
Last year’s lawsuit bore fruit quickly, and we’re optimistic that the FBI and Justice Department will work with us to get us the information to which we’re entitled. [read post]
16 Aug 2024, 1:05 pm
At a moment of further upheavals—neoliberal and/or religious nationalisms, fractured international rights regimes, and democratic populism—we invite re-imaginings of trans in South Asia. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 3:55 am
NASA is not special. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 6:04 am
All 8 Justices should agree. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 3:51 am
This rule is to inhibit law makers from taking advantage of a bill's progress to gain special interest treatment from an unsuspecting legislature.The court's opinion had concurring opinions but Justice Reif (who dissented in part) made some of the most salient points about what could be objectionable to the court if the right case with specific facts were brought to it.1) The appeals process in the opt-out system would "work prejudice in the administration of a statutory right"… [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 6:43 am
He does not say this, but Justice Thomas would presumably say that employers can recover fees if it wins any Title VII case, and if the Court doesn't like it, Congress can re-write the statute to confirm to the principles set forth in Christiansburg-Garment. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
That request was denied because, at the time, there was no right to a court-appointed lawyer barring certain special circumstances. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 7:39 am
It may take some time, but justice will be served in the end. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 5:23 am
Hell, if you’re willing to sacrifice your own child, what’s the big deal about sacrificing a client to the cause? [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 2:42 pm
Like Justice Kennedy, Chief Justice Roberts seems to push Waggoner to ask for more. [read post]
4 Sep 2009, 12:02 pm
More discussion, after the jump.If you're interested in the Justice Department's Honors Program, though, you better act fast. [read post]
13 Apr 2019, 10:48 am
It is political justice. [read post]
1 Jul 2016, 1:39 pm
Whatever feels clear within Greenhouse's memory, the fact is, it wasn't Justice Kennedy who "led off," it was Justice O'Connor. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 1:00 am
Justice Sharp felt no compunction about using his authority as a member of the First Court of Appeals in a bid to obtain special treatment for a teen-aged girl caught shop lifting, did not feel constrained to direct a fusillade of insults at county employees who refused to acquiesce to his meddling, and has not felt constrained by established precedent and rules of procedure in his work on the court of appeals either. [read post]
