Search for: "In re Steven C."
Results 721 - 740
of 1,005
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
As discussed above, Righthaven never sends 512(c)(3) takedown notices, but Righthaven apparently only sues defendants who haven't made the required 512-related filing with the Copyright Office. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
Shawn C. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 1:32 pm
– Grand Forks, ND Rockwell Automation – Milwaukee Law Offices of John C. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 5:27 pm
XVIII, c. 1. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 1:56 pm
Section 105(c)(6) of the Sarbanes-Oxley authorizes the Board to impose sanctions on accounting firms and their supervisory personnel for failing reasonably to supervise associated persons who have violated certain laws, rules, or standards. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
Land, Res. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm
Fletcher / C. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 8:34 pm
Steven C. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
. : Lexington Books/Rowman & Littlefield, c2010.Election LawJK1994 .M66 2010The myth of voter fraud / Lorraine C. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 9:21 pm
It makes me a bit uncomfortable, however, that (a) the conference is styled “The Finest Legal Mind”: A Symposium in Celebration of Justice John Paul Stevens; (b) the conference is stacked with former Stevens clerks, and former clerks rarely criticize their Justices in public; and (c) also consistent with the celebration theme, I don’t see any speaker listed who is likely be critical of the ideological thrust of Justice Stevens’s… [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm
Which of these three options is going to get President Obama re-elected: (a) 500,000 new jobs, (b) expanding health care for 10 million additional Americans, or (c) Seventh Circuit Judge Diane Wood? [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 2:42 pm
STEVEN M. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 12:49 pm
See In re Bilski, 545 F.3d 943 (Fed. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 1:50 pm
The Honorable Steven Gonzáles. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 2:23 am
Stevens, Inc., dba PC Professor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 5:41 pm
Judge Jon C. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 12:26 am
Judge John C. [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 11:37 pm
” New § 2256(c) deals with “jurisdiction and venue,” although in addition to vesting exclusive jurisdiction in the D.C. district court (even if the detainee is moved somewhere else), § 2256(c)(2)(B) purports to bar the exercise of that jurisdiction over any claim other than a “challenge to the legality of the continued detention” of the petitioner, including claims “relating to the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of… [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 9:42 pm
[C]ourts must presume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what it says there. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 11:22 am
Petitions We’re Watching: This is a new feature. [read post]
