Search for: "In the Matter of: Graham" Results 721 - 740 of 2,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 5:11 am by SHG
Having written at great length about the operation of the law, Graham v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 6:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
Isgrò took the matter before an Italian court and a judge has temporarily blocked the album’s physical and digital sale pending a hearing on June 27. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 4:40 am by SHG
Ohio, the 1968 Warren Court decision, to which only Abe Fortas dissented, which goes unmentioned) to Graham v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 5:00 am by Gerry Riskin
As always, I welcome your thoughts on this or any other matter related to the law, either in the comments section below or directly via email. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am by Michael M. O'Hear
As the Fourth Circuit observed, Graham requires an opportunity to obtain release “based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation,” but nothing in Virginia’s program requires release on these grounds, no matter how compelling an inmate’s case for maturity and rehabilitation is. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am by Michael M. O'Hear
As the Fourth Circuit observed, Graham requires an opportunity to obtain release “based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation,” but nothing in Virginia’s program requires release on these grounds, no matter how compelling an inmate’s case for maturity and rehabilitation is. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:08 am by Michael M. O'Hear
As the Fourth Circuit observed, Graham requires an opportunity to obtain release “based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation,” but nothing in Virginia’s program requires release on these grounds, no matter how compelling an inmate’s case for maturity and rehabilitation is. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 4:45 am by Edith Roberts
LeBlanc, in which they reversed a federal appeals court to hold that a Virginia trial court was not unreasonable in ruling that Virginia’s geriatric-release program satisfies Graham v. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
Anyone could see that no matter how the court decided the case, there was an unacceptable risk that the case name would be exploited to inflict colon-laden pun titles on the innocent public. [read post]
7 Jun 2017, 11:34 am by Aurora Barnes
Commonwealth was an objectively unreasonable application of Graham v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:00 am by Russell Spivak
And as the House of Representatives’ website explains, “[m]atters affecting the operations of both the House of Representatives and Senate are usually initiated by means of concurrent resolutions,” while “[a] matter concerning the operation of either the House of Representatives or Senate alone is initiated by a simple resolution. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
Now on to the things that really matter. [read post]
29 May 2017, 6:58 am by Michael Geist
The disagreement over royalty rates (echoed with Music Canada’s anger over the Copyright Board’s Tariff 8 decision, in which the industry also argued that the rates determined by the independent tribunal were “too low”) is fundamentally a matter of negotiation. [read post]
27 May 2017, 1:56 pm by Josh Blackman
Reading the Fourth Circuit’s en banc opinion in International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Whether that is correct as a matter of economics is not for me to judge. [read post]
18 May 2017, 8:23 pm by Aurora Barnes
 require a court to hold patents obvious as a matter of law under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
17 May 2017, 11:02 am by John Elwood
As a statistical matter, we’re getting to the point that it’s time to start expecting dissents from denial in some of these cases. [read post]