Search for: "In the Matter of K. H."
Results 721 - 740
of 1,136
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
The object of the request is Rasema Handanovic, a/k/a Zolja, who allegedly is a citizen of B&H resident in Beaverton, Oregon. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 12:01 pm
(h) The BoA’s written decision was not reasoned with respect to the auxiliary requests.The EBA found the petition not to be clearly inadmissible and then dealt with its allowability:[4] The EBA will consider […] each of the alleged procedural violations (a), (c) to (f) and (h) […] and then consider the general argument relating to all the alleged violations (c) to (h). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 11:07 pm
Widely published on health benefit and other related matters, Ms. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:13 am
Housing being expensive and immovable, there are people who believe that once it’s built, it’s permanent, zoning be damned, and evidently that is what Wayne H. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:42 am
Ferdinand K. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 11:48 am
The hearsay rule is notoriously difficult to conceptualize precisely, because the canonical formulation, that hearsay is "an out-of-court declaration introduced for the truth of the matter asserted," is not transparent. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm
Magistrate Judge Theodore H. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 1:31 pm
Magistrate Judge Theodore H. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 4:30 am
Vonda K. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
The opponent argued that the subject-matter of claim 1 lacked novelty over the prior use of the catalyst T-126 as reported in annex A10 (copy of a letter dated 3 April 1990 sent by Prof. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 4:31 pm
K-V Pharmaceutical Company, C.A. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
Put simply, exemptions are what property you are allowed to keep from creditors no matter what (except for rare circumstances). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm
(h)? [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:28 am
” FBI Assistant Director in Charge Janice K. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
According to the [patent proprietor], the undisputed fact that Mr H. was in fact a professional representative according to Article 134(1) EPC does not help the opponent. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
” The oral proceedings (OPs) before the Board of appeal (BoA) were held in the absence of the patent proprietor.In the grounds of appeal the [opponent] contested novelty and inventive step on the basis of document D2 consisting of 15 slides forming the basis of a presentation entitled “Development of a new processing technique based on the melt route to produce near net shape foam parts”, given by Mr H. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Professional representatives are subject to the disciplinary power exercised by the Institute of Professional Representatives (epi) or the EPO (A 134a(1)(c)) whereas the disciplinary power to which legal practitioners are subject is a matter of national law and is exercised by national organisations or offices. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
The Mannich adduct is “derived from” or produced from three components referred to as (A), (B), and (C) in the presence of alcohol, where (A) is a hydroxy containing aromatic compound having one to four hydrocarbyl groups of up to about 400 carbon atoms, (B) is an aldehyde or ketone having the formula R1-(CO)-R2 wherein R1 and R2 independently are H or hydrocarbyl groups having from 1 to about 18 carbon atoms and R2 can also contain carbonyl, and (C) is a mixture of water and an… [read post]
21 Jan 2012, 2:24 am
Mansel/K. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 11:01 am
Such a reading, however, is not allowable under A 123(2) […]. [8] Thus, there is no implicit disclosure in the application as filed of the subject-matter of claim 1 […]. [read post]
