Search for: "In the Matter of Levi D."
Results 721 - 740
of 793
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2009, 4:02 pm
[D]oes this mean there is little political support for a progressive constitutional vision? [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 11:26 am
The few remaining matters could presumably be dealt with by the Copyright Board. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:22 am
These two matters -- getting less or nothing from SIPC and becoming subject to clawbacks by Picard -- have been extensively discussed and explained previously -- by many writers. [read post]
7 Jun 2009, 8:14 pm
It is really a simple matter of nurses, doctors and management personnel being more meticulous in how they perform patient safety courses of action. [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
It's just a matter of time. 2. [read post]
10 May 2009, 6:41 am
James Oberstar (D. [read post]
5 May 2009, 10:32 am
LB Readers, we’d love to hear your thoughts on this. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:00 am
: In re Kubin and KSR International Co v Teleflex Inc (Patent Docs) US Patents – Decisions CAFC: USPTO, Tafas & GSK request extension for reconsideration (IP Watchdog) CAFC: Patent on sex aid is obvious: Ritchie v Vast Resources (AKA Topco) (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) CAFC: Assigning patent rights: Euclid Chemical v Vector Corrosion (Patently-O) (Hal Wegner) District Court E D Michigan: LEDdynamics wins summary judgment in LED tube patent suit (Green Patent Blog)… [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 3:23 am
You bet.John Levi, a Sidley partner who helps supervise recruiting, testified that there was "no way in the world" Sidley would have extended Friedman an offer if they'd known his real grades. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 9:41 am
But don't forget you may need to try different forms of the word tax, taxation, taxes, levies, etc. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 1:49 am
So it won't breed competition in among the ISPs, but we'd be willing to cost-share this service with small cable companies. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 8:17 am
There are six cosponsors of the bill including: Representatives Earl Blumenauer (D-OR); Rush Holt, (D-NJ); Jim McDermott (D-WA); George Miller (D-CA); James Moran (D-VA); and David Wu (D-OR). [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:45 pm
True or not, it likely doesn't matter. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 12:00 pm
I'd probably be mad. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 9:33 am
As shown above, IT DOESN'T MATTER whether you are right or wrong because even if you are right (you’re not) these theories aren't going to help you anyhow, since no court will recognize these theories and they will not stop the IRS from levying taxes, fines, and sanctions, or from seizing your property. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 6:25 pm
It did not matter that the landlord was the company or the tenant was a shareholder. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 7:48 am
But it no longer matters. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
D&R reported the theft to SJ on December 12. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:26 pm
Levi. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
" Summary Judgment: "In the instant case, the defendant established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the plaintiff would not have been successful in an action against the NYCHA on a theory of constructive notice. [read post]
