Search for: "Jacobson v. Jacobson"
Results 721 - 740
of 757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Nov 2009, 2:43 am
Joel Jacobson cuts through the gobbledygook. [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 9:04 pm
The principle that a competent person has a constitutionally protected liberty interest in refusing unwanted medical treatment can be traced back to Jacobson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:32 am
" Jacobson v. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 5:44 am
The Supreme Court said as much when two important cases are read together: the 1905 decision in Jacobson v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:57 am
Such a decision was at odds with the Supreme Court's decision in Qualitex v Jacobson (1995) which held that a single color can be a valid trade mark "where the color has attained 'secondary meaning' and therefore identifies and distinguishes a particular brand (and thus indicates its 'source')". [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:57 am
”As he put it, “When the constitutionality of COVID restrictions has been challenged in court, the leading authority cited in their defense is a 1905 Supreme Court decision called Jacobson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Records v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 6:21 am
’ Jacobson v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
The bonds in both the Jacobson and Nine Thirty FEF matters contain riders which provide that they will cover loss resulting directly from the dishonest acts of any Outside Investment Advisor na [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:57 pm
The Supreme Court inQualitex v Jacobson (1995) held that a single color can be a valid trade mark "where the color has attained 'secondary meaning' and therefore identifies and distinguishes a particular brand (and thus indicates its 'source')". [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
Copcutt v. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 11:57 am
In Jacobson v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
The same can apply for color trade marks and trade dress in the U.S. as long as the color has acquired a "secondary meaning" and is non-functional, i.e. the color does not function except as an indication as to source (Qualitex v Jacobson) Ask any shopper on Fifth Avenue and the AmeriKat thinks one could quickly come to the conclusion that the primary function of the red-sole is that of indicating the source of the shoe as being Louboutin - that or signalling to the poor… [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am
And when it’s former-associate v. firm, that’s all the more interesting. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 9:58 am
For example, in Jones v, thedirty, the judge took 230 off the table, which left the defendant Nik Richie defending content he didn’t create. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 6:47 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
Drawing in witnesses When the Court recognized a public right of access to criminal trials, in Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
., Amber Taylor responds to her heckler by explaining how he also could get into Harvard.David Lat at Above the Law reports on the case of Steinbuch v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
At Balkinization, guest blogger Sharon Dolovich explains why the Supreme Court’s Farmer v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:17 am
Jacobson v. [read post]
