Search for: "Jefferson v Long" Results 721 - 740 of 745
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2007, 10:00 am
That was the question addressed by the New York State Court of Appeals in People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 9:17 pm
For eleven stellar seasons, the CBS hit "The Jeffersons" told the hilarious story of George and Weezie, who had moved on up the socio-economic ladder to "a deluxe apartment in the sky. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:19 am
It would be a user right.Originality v. novelty - copyright and patent. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 11:12 am
  The Civil War, rather than the founding - rather than Marbury v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 7:51 am
S. 681, 698-699 (1997) ("We have, in short, long recognized the 'unique position in the constitutional scheme' that [the Office of the President] occupies" (quoting Nixon v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 8:03 pm
The pairs he examines are: 1) John Marshall (M/P) and Thomas Jefferson (IPW) 2) John Marshall Harlan (M/P) and Oliver Wendell Holmes (IPW) 3) Hugo Black (M/P) and Melvin William Douglas (IPW) 4) William Rehnquist (M/P) and Antonin Scalia (IPW) Of these, the only ideologically pure warrior to have influenced constitutional law in the long run, according to Rosen, is Holmes, and only because he moderated his judicial philosophy in the 1920s. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 9:12 am
Among the amici urging the Court simply to overrule Flast v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:00 am
Jefferson County Board of Education and Parents Involved in Community Schools v. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 10:40 am
Carys Craig, Osgoode Hall Law School, Beyond Author v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 9:03 pm
Yet another challenge to original-intent originalism was posed by Jefferson Powell's famous article, The Original Understanding of Original Intent, published in 1985. [read post]
12 Jan 2007, 1:46 pm
"We know the law in fact situation X because the Court decided Y in the case of Doe v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 9:08 pm
In the words of Jefferson, the clause against establishment of religion by law was intended to erect 'a wall of separation between Church and State.' Reynolds v. [read post]
5 Dec 2006, 7:15 pm
As long as these views persist, constitutional reform founded on democratic claims must first clear some ground. [read post]