Search for: "KERR v. STATE" Results 721 - 740 of 1,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2011, 5:17 am by INFORRM
Ward LJ also drew support from the Supreme Court’s judgment in ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] UKSC 4. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
United States] Housing disparate impact theory, dodged by administration last time around, returns to Court [Bloomberg, Daniel Fisher; Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 12:31 am by Orin Kerr
From that perspective Katz was something like United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:20 am by Erin Miller
The Court heard argument yesterday in Samantar v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 4:40 am by SHG
Caifornia and United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
Lord Kerr queries why the prorogation needed to cover the conference recess. [read post]
14 May 2020, 1:13 am by CMS
” 1259: Lord Kerr thanks the parties for their submissions and brings proceedings to a close. 1258: Finally, Mr Hoskins QC says the issue of whether there is sufficient evidence to reach a conclusion on certification is unique to the facts of each case. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:31 am by Russ Bensing
Yesterday we talked about the 8th District’s decision in State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 3:57 am by Amy Howe
In an op-ed for The Washington Post, John Kerr urges the Court to grant review in the property rights case Central Radio Co. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 1:42 pm by Orin Kerr
Some readers may remember my post from last May at the old WaPo site about the Second Circuit briefs filed in Marsh v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 7:50 am by Jay Willis
Florida, United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 6:59 am
Yesterday, the Court heard arguments in United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:47 am by Laura Sandwell
Al-Sirri v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 15 May 2012. [read post]
9 Aug 2017, 3:09 am by AIDAN WILLS MATRIX
Equally, the powerful dissenting judgment of Lords Kerr and Wilson is illustrative of growing disquiet about the privacy rights of individuals arrested/investigated but not charged with criminal offences. [read post]