Search for: "Kerr v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2015, 3:13 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Toulson, Lord Kerr and Lord Neuberger in the majority stated that Hamblen J had reached an entirely proper conclusion that the role played by the appellant, based mainly on its fundraising relating to a small sum solicited by the Sea Shepherd Conversation Society (SSCS), had been of minimal importance. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:41 am by Ilya Somin
UPDATE: As co-blogger Orin Kerr pointed out in this 2007 post, Justice Ginsburg later stated that one purpose of her dissent in Ledbetter was “”to attract immediate public attention and to propel legislative change. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm by Sam Claydon, Olswang LLP
(JUSTICES: Lord Hope (Deputy President), Lord Walker, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, and Lord Carnwath) The post Joint Administrators of Heritable Bank plc (Respondent) v The Winding-Up Board of Landsbanki Islands hf (Appellant) (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 13 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 6:37 am
The Bankruptcy Litigation Blog covers the Court’s Monday action in Indiana State Police Pension Trust v. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 7:34 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Generally speaking, Lord Carnwath – with whom Lords Kerr, Wilson, Reed and Briggs concurred – held that Part 5A deliberately establishes an uncomplicated set of rules. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 10:19 am by Blog Editorial
R (on the application of Quila and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and R (on the application of Bibi and another) (FC) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 8 – 9 June 2011. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:57 am by William Ford
Sharon Bradford Franklin explained how United States v. [read post]
13 Oct 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
United States] Housing disparate impact theory, dodged by administration last time around, returns to Court [Bloomberg, Daniel Fisher; Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]