Search for: "King v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 6,157
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2011, 11:52 am by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) Today’s news that Paul Clement is leaving King & Spaulding over his defense of DOMA reminds me of one of the big stories among Harvard Law students when I was a student there back in the mid-1990s: The boycott of Sidley & Austin for its representation of the state of Colorado in Romer v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm by Marty Lederman
 (When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:37 pm by Albert Wan
Courtesy of Doug Berman over at Sentencing Law and Policy: Gray Proctor and criminal procedure guru, Nancy King, have jointly authored an article entitled Post Padilla: Padilla’s Puzzles for Review in State and Federal Courts. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 8:23 am
" (Matter of Daben Corp., 469 F Supp 135, 141 [DPR 1979]; see also Stecher v 85th Estates Co., 43 AD3d 732, 743 [1st Dept 2007] [McGuire, J., dissenting]; 2657 East 68th Street Corp. v Bergen Beach Yacht Club, 161 Misc 2d 1031, 1033 [Civ Ct, Kings County 1994].) [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:12 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) SL (Vietnam) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 225 (11 March 2010) Farinloye & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 203 (11 March 2010) Priory Caring Services Ltd v Capita Property Services Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 226 (11 March 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) McVey & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of… [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 6:01 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Montana Eighth Judicial District Court: Whether the “arise out of or relate to” requirement for a state court to exercise specific personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant under Burger King Corp. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 4:16 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
., LLC. v Rivkin Radler LLP,  .2018 NY Slip Op 32913(U)  November 13, 2018 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: 505978/18 Judge: Leon Ruchelsman is an example of what happens when a doctor to doctor business sale goes wrong. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:05 pm by Eugene Volokh
It's possible that the federal Free Exercise Clause would do the same, even after Employment Division v. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:26 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Similarly, the Court held that in relation to s 7, the principle of daily apportionment would apply except where the contract states otherwise in clear terms. [read post]