Search for: "King v. United States Government" Results 721 - 740 of 1,659
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2014, 12:24 pm
United States, 134 S.Ct. 881, 892 (2014)(quoting Commissioner v. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 7:34 am by The Charge
United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992), the defendant was unable to point to specific facts illustrating that the delay harmed his ability to defend himself adequately. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:54 pm by Ken White
This famously happened when the federal government prosecuted the police officers who beat Rodney King even after they were acquitted in state court. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am by New Books Script
Holmes Beach, FL : Gaunt, 2010 KF 75 ZC2 C39 1739A V.2 An abridgment of the publick statutes in force and use from Magna Charta, in the ninth year of King Henry III, to the eleventh year of His present Majesty King George II, inclusive / by John Cay ; in two volumes. [read post]
11 Aug 2024, 12:25 pm by Josh Blackman
Perry (same-sex marriage) Joined blue state amicus brief in United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 12:23 pm by Bill Merkel
   Section 1 clause 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment states “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 11:33 am
United States, 232 U.S. 383 (1914), the case that is generally understood as having introduced the exclusionary rule. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Jeremy Liles
” Although they conceded that the purchase and sale of the shares took place outside the United States, the plaintiffs alleged that the Exchange Act still reached their claims under two theories: 1) the purchase was “in connection with” trades made in the United States; and 2) the defendants’ investments constituted an “economic reality” of trades made in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by Jeremy Liles
” Although they conceded that the purchase and sale of the shares took place outside the United States, the plaintiffs alleged that the Exchange Act still reached their claims under two theories: 1) the purchase was “in connection with” trades made in the United States; and 2) the defendants’ investments constituted an “economic reality” of trades made in the United States. [read post]
20 May 2011, 9:23 am by Kiera Flynn
” Gun rights groups have filed an amicus brief in support of the federal government’s petition for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Guest Author
All the other cases were decided under Step One or under an exception, such as United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am by Adam Klein, Benjamin Wittes
Several basic themes emerge from a survey of the history and law of quarantine in the United States. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
The Supreme Court has even stated as much in its 1985 decision in Heckler v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 11:41 am by NCC Staff
Amy Coney Barrett’s Judicial Philosophy Doesn’t Hold Up to Scrutiny By Angus King Jr., United States Senator, Maine and Heather Cox Richardson, Professor of History, Boston College Angus King Jr. and Heather Cox Richardson argue against originalism—the method of legal interpretation that favors interpreting the Constitution or laws based strictly on their original meaning—and for an interpretative philosophy that looks to the ideals and… [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm
 Louisiana Law     Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2:22-CV-1114. [read post]