Search for: "Liability and Insurers for each Defendant" Results 721 - 740 of 3,389
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2012, 1:36 am by Kevin LaCroix
      Equally problematic for Sony, it has been sued by its commercial general liability (CGL) insurer, Zurich American, which is seeking to avoid coverage by arguing that its general liability policies do not and never were intended to cover data breaches. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 8:27 am by Ira Meislik
” Why do negotiators who often don’t know the difference between what property insurance covers and what liability insurance covers, let alone what really is “contractual liability coverage,” defend their positions until hell freezes over? [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 11:41 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The equivalent wording in D&O Insurance Policies reads as follows: “Within one period of insurance, the insurer’s duty to provide indemnification is limited to the overall insured sum for each insured event and for all insured events in the aggregate. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:00 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Each party essentially seeks to have the Court adopt its own interpretation of the legal effect of the General Commercial Liability Policy in effect. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 2:39 pm
PROFESSIONAL LIABILITY - NON-COOPERATION - TIMELINESS OF DISCLAIMERContinental Cas. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 12:39 pm by WIMS
      On appeal, a central issue involved the proper method under Massachusetts law for allocating liability for long-term environmental contamination where the defendant GCL insurer had provided coverage for the risk for only a portion of the time during which the contamination took place. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 1:15 am by Kevin LaCroix
  A good introductory summary to the limitations of traditional insurance and the need for the specialized cyber liability insurance to protect against these risks can be in a two part series by Roberta Anderson of the K&L Gates law firm entitled “Insurance Coverage for Cyber Attacks, ” which can be found here and here. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:08 am by dhdlaw
  Though some lawsuits can be resolved in a straightforward manner, others may involve complicated issues of liability, such as splitting fault between multiple co-defendants and establishing potential employer liability or manufacturer liability (for product defects). [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:36 am by Herrman & Herrman, P.L.L.C.
This compensation is typically paid through some form of liability insurance coverage the at-fault party holds. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 6:50 am by Clay Hodges
  This will usually involve a settlement framework where the defendant company will pay certain amounts of money directly to each plaintiff who qualifies, and further, will pay the liens outstanding for these qualifying individuals. [read post]
1 May 2018, 12:53 pm by William K. Berenson
Many injured people assume that the at-fault driver’s insurance company will simply pay off each medical bill one by one. [read post]
However, since she did not carry insurance, she also named her father’s insurance company as a defendant, relying on that policy’s uninsured motorist provision. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 8:56 am
" The suit was moved earlier this week to federal district court, and the agency's DC accident lawyer said the insurer "failed in its most fundamental and important responsibility: Protecting WMATA against avoidable out-of-pocket casualty losses" by not fully explaining the total liability involving layers of coverage and deductibles incurred at each tier of coverage. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 3:57 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  However, Judge Herlong noted, “other insurance clauses govern the relationship between insurers; they do not affect the right of the insured to recover under each concurrent policy. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 3:00 am
While a parent may have a very strong legal case for the wrongful death of a child, the named Defendants may not have liability insurance, assets, or even a job. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 5:15 am
  So, in ostensibly defending "innocent" shareholders, Petitioners would prevent settlements or judgments from ancillary wrongdoers, most likely shifting the liability away from these wrongdoers and back to the "innocent" shareholders they purport to want to protect. [read post]