Search for: "Long v. Hooks"
Results 721 - 740
of 756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2013, 12:20 pm
Professor Nalini Ambady (1959-2013) Bonjours de Toulouse, where I'm visiting this month at the Institute for Advanced Study (IAST), which is hosted by the Université de Toulouse Capitole and physically (and in many senses conceptually) situated inside the Toulouse School of Economics. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
” See West River Bridge v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:30 pm
[We grateful to Victoria Saker Woeste of the American Bar Foundation (vswoeste@abfn.org) for this full report of an excellent conference. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 11:01 pm
Regardless of what happens to him, the Administration must not be let off the hook for its unfair, unjust and un-American treatment of the detainees.Of course, we've all heard the word "detainees" until it probably doesn't mean much anymore. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm
It is meant to address a series of long-standing environmental issues related to soil and groundwater contamination around the corporations facilities on Main Street in Pella. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am
Last month, a federal appeals panel gave the back of its hand to Rep. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:26 am
The general rule is that as long as the doctor makes clear what the risks of the surgery are, they’re free to perform it. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:06 pm
As long as tax fraud or evasion isn’t committed, you may be eligible to have the debt discharged. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:22 am
Doe 1 v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:01 pm
This would also help dispense with competitive advantages enjoyed by firms that break the law: all companies would be on the hook for civil penalties for law violations, not just those that are repeat offenders. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:07 pm
What the Supreme Court did in Ohio v. [read post]
10 Mar 2018, 8:44 pm
Indeed, in the 1936 case of United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:34 am
Sharon Davis: And certainly that was the case in the Fiaco v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
According to the Durham standard, it seems, as long as the police deal with a “serious” claim of wrongdoing, they can behave according to virtually any standard. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 7:35 am
This exercise has the merit, at the price of some repetition, of highlighting long-standing issues with the Bill. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:51 pm
This is the second in a hopefully finite series of blog posts about the legal issues in the NetChoice cases, in which platforms raise First Amendment challenges to social media laws in Texas and Florida. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 6:02 pm
In that sense, PACT has a long way to go. [read post]
