Search for: "Long v. United States" Results 721 - 740 of 21,074
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Aug 2021, 3:22 pm by Michael Gilbert and Shin Hahn
  The decision limits the application of the “fugitive disentitlement” doctrine – which has long prevented foreign nationals from challenging criminal prosecutions without appearing in the United States to do so. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:00 am by David Kopel
” The statute would therefore outlaw the sale in the United States of a bullfighting video produced in Spain (since bullfighting is not legal in the United States), the sale of any hunting video or magazine in the District of Columbia (since no hunting is allowed in the District) or the sale of a crossbow hunting video or magazine in the many states which allow hunting with compound bows but not with crossbows. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:33 pm by Madelaine Lane
  Accordingly, a cost incurred by a local unit of government as a result of a mandate does not automatically constitute a necessary cost so long as it is not de minimis. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 1:07 pm by Tom Goldstein
”  Like Justice Sotomayor, they could have agreed with Scalia on the installation and Alito on the long-term monitoring. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 9:11 am
The ILB has had a long list of entries on the 7th Circuit decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:10 pm by Jim Shore
Yesterday the United States Supreme Court issued a long-anticipated decision in City of Ontario v. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 6:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Riverside County, et al, 5:14-cv-00007-DMG-DBT (United States District Court, Central District of California). [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:26 am by Matt C. Bailey
On April 21, 2010, the Ninth Circuit ruled that a Federal court’s CAFA jurisdiction is not contingent on certification of a class in United Steel v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:37 am by Kent Scheidegger
United States, No. 13-9972.I'll have more to say on this list later.Over at SCOTUSblog, all their "breaking news" blurb has to say about the list is that the Court took no action on the same-sex marriage cases. [read post]