Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2011, 7:00 pm
Rainy Sky S.A. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 4:18 am
But, as Lord Neuberger acknowledged, it has also been said that the rigour demanded of an art 3-compliant investigation is “similar” to but by definition then, not the same as investigations into state complicity. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 7:22 am
However, this failure to update direct insurance procurement tax laws may literally prove costly, as illustrated under the recently decided New Jersey Tax Court case, Johnson & Johnson v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 10:55 pm
The Lord Nataraja Temple in the town of Chidambaram is an important religious pilgrimage site. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 4:26 pm
The first full week of term will see the hand down on Wednesday 12 June 2019 by the Supreme Court (Lords Kerr, Wilson, Sumption, Hodge, and Briggs) of its long awaited judgment in the “serious harm” case of Lachaux v Independent Print. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 2:00 am
The test of dishonesty is as set out by Lord Nicholls in Royal Brunei Airlines Sdn Bhd v Tan and by Lord Hoffmann in Barlow Clowes… When dishonesty is in question the fact-finding tribunal must first ascertain (subjectively) the actual state of the individual’s knowledge or belief as to the facts. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 6:57 am
Interestingly, while not a party, the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government was given permission to intervene. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:00 pm
ARTICLE V. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 4:38 am
R(Ahmad) v LB Newham [2009] UKHL 14 is now available and the Lords have done a pretty good job at destroying the jurisprudence built up by the High Court and Court of Appeal in Part 6 cases. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 4:01 am
Expanding on the Supreme Court’s decision on the first argument, Lord Clarke stated that the only question is whether the maps were drawn to a scale of not less than 1:25,000 and held that they were. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:12 am
J noted that R v Purdy suggested that the UKSC would offer some assistance where a recent judgment was inconsistent with subsequent ECHR judgments (see also Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 3) [2009] 3 WLR 74, cited by Lord Brown in Horncastle at [118], referring to the wonderful sentence of Lord Rodger: ""Argentoratum locutum, iudicium finitum - Strasbourg has spoken, the case is closed. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 9:14 am
In particular, treaty obligations cease to apply to a territory where it secedes from the state which entered into the treaty, or for example where a formerly dependent territory becomes independent from the parent state which entered into the treaty. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 12:21 am
Lord Justice Aiken, delivering the unanimous verdict of the Court, which included Lord Justice Longmore who delivered the leading judgment in AP (Trinidad & Tobago) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 551, dismissed the appeal. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 6:31 am
Lord v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:02 am
Mr Hoskins QC states that it does. 14:37: Lord Briggs questions whether there may be cases where equality is equity and that equality of distribution is fair. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 2:00 am
The Seller relied on The Golden Victory (Golden Strait Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:05 am
Last week, federal district courts in three states handed down decisions in cases in which a former employee was suing his or her employer for refusing to provide them with a religious exemption from the employer's Covid vaccine mandate.In Crocker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:35 am
Lord Neuberger stated that the FOIA 2000, s 53, does not permit the Attorney General to override the decision of a judicial tribunal or Court by issuing a certificate merely because he, considering the same facts and arguments, takes a different view from that taken by the tribunal or Court. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 6:29 am
The Moore Opinion also states that the true and fair view is of an overarching nature. [read post]
