Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 6:16 am
SSUK relied heavily on Sabaf SpA v Meneghetti SpA [2003] RPC 14 at [59], which states that the joint tortfeasor must have “made the tortious act his own”. [read post]
2 Jul 2015, 3:27 am
” In the minority on this issue, Lord Sumption (with whom Lord Neuberger and Lord Reed agreed) gave a dissenting judgment in which he stated that Zurich should only be liable to IEG in the first instance for 22.08% of the full loss. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
The test for determining such an issue was recently authoritatively stated by the Supreme Court in the case of McInnes v HM Advocate 2010 SLT 266. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 12:00 am
The other members of the panel were the Master of the Rolls and ex-‘Treasury Devil‘ Lord Justice Sales. [read post]
Case preview: Greater Glasgow Health Board (Appellant) v Doogan and another (Respondents) (Scotland)
11 Nov 2014, 7:03 am
The House of Lords decision in R v Salford HA Ex p Janaway Lady Smith found support for her interpretation in the case of R v Salford HA Ex p Janaway [1989] 1 AC 537. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:44 am
(ii) The Strike Out Appeal In Summers v Fairclough Homes [2012] UKSC 26, Lord Clarke held that that the court has power to strike out a statement of claim on the ground that the claim is an abuse of the process of the court at any time. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 3:35 am
The Delaware Supreme Court, in a decision issued last week in Blaustein v Lord Baltimore Capital Corp., No. 272 [Del. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling, continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice system with it. [read post]
26 May 2013, 10:26 am
Dear Reader, Our Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Basil Grayling, continues to provide food for thought for serious commentators and fodder for satirists alike with his ill conceived plan to destroy legal aid and the criminal justice system with it. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 3:44 am
[1] International Energy Group Limited v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2012] EWHC 69 (Comm) [2] Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20 [3] International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich Insurance plc UK [2013] EWCA Civ 39 [4] BAI (Run off) Ltd (In Scheme of Arrangement) and others v Durham and others [2012] 1 WLR 867 [5] Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 The post Case Preview: International Energy Group Ltd v Zurich… [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
The court’s unanimous judgement was issued by Lord Reed. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 2:30 am
Lord Kerr highlighted that there was clearly a proximity of relationship between the respondent and Ms Michael. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 6:00 pm
... 1997 (10 years ago today), Canada's Supreme Court held in Winnipeg Child and Family Services (Northwest Area) v. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am
The Supreme Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, with whom Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson agreed) unanimously allowed the Commissioner’s appeal. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 3:13 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Sumption giving the joint lead judgments stated that the fundamental principle is that the penalty rule regulates only the contractual remedy available for the breach of primary contractual obligations, and not the fairness of those primary obligations themselves. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 8:39 am
Supreme Court Rank was granted leave to appeal by the Supreme Court and the case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lord Reed, Lord Carnwath, Lord Toulson and Lord Hodge on 21 April 2015, which can be viewed on demand on the Supreme Court’s website. [read post]
20 May 2016, 2:11 am
Lord Mance stated that the Court of Appeal had made an error of law by too closely assimilating the tort of invasion of privacy with a breach of confidence when it stated that “a claim for misuse of private information can and often will survive when information in is in the public domain. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 2:13 am
State, 643 S.W.2d 709, 718 (Tex. [read post]
