Search for: "M/V Lord"
Results 721 - 740
of 914
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2010, 9:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 5:05 pm
Labour’s Lord Campbell-Savours said the law has allowed a man to use a “wall of anonymity” and make allegations against public figures without evidence. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
Surveillance and Information Gathering MPs discussed and voted on the Investigatory Powers Bill last week in the report stage of the Bill’s progression through Parliament, the third vote before the Bill was sent to the House of Lords. [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Rep. 489, 498 (1763) (Lord Chief Justice Pratt). [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 11:05 pm
I’m your Tenant! [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 6:41 am
I’m not a family lawyer – but Natasha Phillips is and her Researching Reform blog often ‘Questions it’ and provides insight into the rights and wrongs of our family justice system. [read post]
The appearance of a substantial defence in possession claims, and property guardians and possession.
6 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
In Collier v P & M J Wright (Holdings) Ltd (2007) EWCA Civ 1329 that test had been held to be the same as that for summary judgment. [read post]
19 May 2015, 8:18 am
Garcia v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:55 pm
At first instance, Mr Justice Collins dismissed TTM’s claim holding that his detention had not been unlawful until such time as the court declared the decision-making process to have been defective – applying R v Managers of South Western Hospital ex p M [1993] QB 683 and R v Central London County Court ex p London [1999] QB 1260 and distinguishing Re S-C (Mental Patient Habeas Corpus) [1996] QB 599 as it was not directly concerned with that question. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
“We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what the judges say it is… “-- Charles Evans Hughes, 11th Chief Justice of the United States.[1]ADNAN M L KARIMBarrister-at-Law The Supreme Court has declared the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution illegal and void ab initio; condemning military rules in explicit language[2]. [read post]
28 Dec 2016, 3:00 pm
I’m afraid I’m going to gush about one and be a little bit hard on the other. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
The most recent reference to the law of patents being wholly statutory are the words of Lord Walker in Synthon B.V. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Michel V. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
However, he managed to win his fair share of the legal arguments and even appeared successfully before the Supreme Court [ed. note: Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 12:52 pm
From Business Leaders in Christ v. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 1:11 pm
That’s the issue in Grzyb v. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 3:05 am
Chief Justice, I’m sorry,” he said. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 7:53 pm
I would suggest two initial responses: a) given the clear mess at a ECHR level and the odd finding of the House of Lords in the Animal Defenders case, I’m not sure how much scope there is to challenge the current position, and b) it may depend, as I’ve suggested below, on how far the enforcer goes in restricting political activities - where the broad interpretation of marketing includes both content as well as style, a freedom of expression-based challenge may… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:11 am
Cat also submitted a nearly-invisible illustration (right) of two shirts, one bearing the legend" I'm appealing ... [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 1:38 am
I’m happy to visit the sun for 2 weeks but I don’t want to stay there, although Spain is proving mightily attractive all round for people in my line of work. [read post]
