Search for: "MARKS v. STATE"
Results 721 - 740
of 21,522
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2011, 4:13 am
Lexmark responds that it is not subject to false marking liability in part because it includes a disclaimer stating that the product is covered by one or more of the listed patents. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 3:56 pm
Sheppard Mullin’s intellectual property group prevailed before the United States Supreme Court in the trademark matter entitled Hana Financial v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 6:59 pm
Today my Damon Key colleagues Mark Murakami, Christi-Anne Kudo Chock, and I filed for the Ocean Tourism Coalition a brief amicus curiae (88kb pdf) in the US Supreme Court supporting the petition for writ of certiorari filed in UFO Chuting of Hawaii, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:20 pm
., with oral argument in Kahler v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 9:08 am
In Arctic Cat Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2015, 12:07 pm
See Suisman, Shapiro, Wool, Brennan, Gray & Greenberg P.C. v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 3:01 am
Ct. of Appeals Oral Arguments in Kaur v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:17 am
Spireon, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:28 am
See Devicor Medical Products, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 1:14 pm
Case Information Marlboro Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 3:37 am
Union of India v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:34 am
State v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 8:50 pm
" Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 8:13 am
Topek, LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
On 1 February 2023, the General Court of the EU issued two judgments (T-568/21 and T-569/21 – Zoubier Harbaoui v EUIPO) on two trade mark oppositions filed by Google with the EUIPO against the trade mark applications for the signs "GOOGLE CAR" and "GC GOOGLE CAR". [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 4:26 am
PepsiCo, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 3:51 pm
Salters v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 3:15 am
United States Postal Service v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 6:44 am
[Referring to the provisions of the Regulation that permit transfer, securitisation and licensing, the first sentence of Article 23(1) states that "... such an act, before it is so entered [in the Register of Community trade marks], shall have effect vis-à-vis third parties who have acquired rights in the trade mark after the date of that act but who knew of the act at the date on which the rights were acquired"]. [read post]
