Search for: "MARTINEZ V. STATE" Results 721 - 740 of 1,669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Nov 2011, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180). [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:49 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Co. of N.Y., 98 NY2d 314, 326; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87; Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180). [read post]
30 May 2013, 8:47 am by Matthew Lanahan
Thaler, in which the Court held that when a state’s procedural framework makes it highly unlikely in a typical case that a defendant will have a meaningful opportunity to raise on direct appeal a claim that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance, the good cause exception recognized in Martinez v. [read post]
4 May 2008, 10:52 pm
Martinez, No. 1:04-CV-0927 (NPM), 2007 WL 4618524, at *4 (N.D.N.Y Dec. 27, 2007) (citing Rubin v. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 4:46 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“With regard to the first cause of action, Izmirligil failed to state a cause of action under Real Property Law § 329 against the BNYM defendants and Chase (see CPLR 3211[a][7]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 7:08 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is quite long and is abbreviated here to, Ann Martinez v. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 1:32 pm by Shaw Drake
In 1976, the Supreme Court decided in U.S. v Martinez-Fuerte that Border Patrol may operate checkpoints and stop vehicles, without a warrant, for brief questioning of their immigration status even if they have no particularized suspicion of unlawful activity or immigration status. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“The Noerr-Pennington doctrine protects the right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution to petition the government for governmental action, including through litigation and activity incidental to litigation” (Matter of People v Northern Leasing Sys., Inc., 193 AD3d 67, 77 [citation omitted]; see Alfred Weissman Real Estate v Big V Supermarkets, 268 AD2d 101, 106-107). [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:19 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiffs' expert affidavit was properly considered to remedy any defects in the complaint (see Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
He made some policy arguments about how the statute is to be liberally construed (recently reiterated in the Martinez v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm by Alina Artunian
In its last term, the Supreme Court took up the case of Molina-Martinez v. [read post]