Search for: "MATTER OF T A AND T R A"
Results 721 - 740
of 53,431
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2023, 2:46 pm
States and localities can't skirt the text of broad preemption provisions by doing indirectly what Congress says they can't do directly. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am
R. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:16 am
Jordan—joined by House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) and House Administration Chair Bryan Steil (R-Wis.) [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 8:41 am
“You’re a cop aren’t you? [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 3:50 am
Not that this matters much to the nice folks at Netflix desperate for stories, true or not. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 2:51 am
The FBI was searching for messages about Darin LaHood (R-IL) because it was investigating suspicions that a foreign government had targeted him as part of an espionage or influence operation, people familiar with the matter have said. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 11:34 am
They don’t always provide the source of their answers. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 7:13 am
R. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:02 pm
Mitchell, 2014 IL 116311 (citations omitted) If you don’t have service…you don’t have a viable divorce case. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 8:45 am
Their position is “[Congress]… determined that definitions for musical works, dramatic works, choreographic works, and pantomimes were unnecessary because these terms ‘have fairly settled meanings’… As a general matter, a work that was created to be performed before an audience, directly or indirectly, is a work of the performing arts. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:00 am
American politics, it seems, has become a matter of simple amplification. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 5:44 am
Why didn't the law school have a plan? [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 3:47 pm
Thus, the safe harbor comes to an end w/r/t © content. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Some member states would define actual knowledge to be limited to manifestly illegal content; some wouldn’t; some would have notice and takedown, others didn’t; etc. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am
We don’t have definite caselaw. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 11:25 am
Il s’agit du critère de « l’intérêt public » établi par la Cour suprême du Canada (la Cour suprême) en 2016 dans l’arrêt R. c. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:39 am
R. 206(c)(1) (emphasis mine). [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:19 pm
On 23 January 2023, the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR found that restricting and labelling a book of fairy tales as harmful to children solely because of LGBTI content breached Article 10 ECHR. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 5:31 am
These experts made a strong case that it would be a matter of time until al-Qaeda acquired the capabilities to strike the U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 2:20 am
Explanatory Reports Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève „Convention of 2 July 2019 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters: Explanatory Report“, as approved by the HCCH on 22 September 2020 (available here) Garcimartín Alférez, Francisco; Saumier, Geneviève “Judgments Convention: Revised Draft Explanatory Report”, HCCH Prel. [read post]
