Search for: "MUSIC v. STATE"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am
Nishimori * De Minimis Music Sampling Isn’t Infringement–Salsoul v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 7:16 pm
The Court of Appeal after referring to several passages from the ESA case stated: In my view, this passage reaffirms the fundamental distinction between reproduction and performance (communication to the public by telecommunication) that the Court articulated in Bishop v. [read post]
4 Dec 2010, 11:16 am
Joel Tenenbaum, a graduate student, was found to have infringed the copyrights in 30 songs and was slapped with damages of $675,000 (Sony BMG Music Entertainment v. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 12:21 pm
The land is zoned for agricultural use, designated within the state agricultural and conservation district, and subject to environmental protections for coastal lands. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 12:16 pm
Majekolagbe, Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 9:55 am
In a 1992 Supreme Court decision, Dawson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2009, 4:29 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:34 am
v=sALhYkA-ij4 [read post]
4 Feb 2018, 3:48 am
The Library of Congress, which is the oldest federal cultural institution in the United States, describes the song as America’s “most powerful song. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 3:31 am
Doug Jacobson of Iowa State University, taken in UMG v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The NAB v. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 2:51 am
Wonderbread 5 v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:23 am
Universal Music. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 4:10 am
In an (unfortunately) not-for-publication opinion, the 9th Circuit affirmed a defense summary judgment in Carson v. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
"Detailed analysis of Federal Circuit hearing in Oracle v. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 10:37 pm
Amistad Christiana Church v Life is Beautiful, LLC, 2015 WL 5532299 (D. [read post]
1 May 2019, 12:00 am
In the Campbell v. [read post]
8 Jul 2007, 7:57 pm
’ Therefore, Dastar controls, and Gee-Gee fails to state a claim under the Lanham Act. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 12:12 pm
In Arista Records v. [read post]
