Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 721 - 740
of 5,961
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2008, 5:35 pm
(AP/Jae C. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 4:27 am
Infringement under section 10(3) of the 1994 Act and Article 9(1)(c) of the Regulation [protection for marks with a reputation against use without due cause] was also established. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 6:43 am
However, he went on to explain that the decision is perhaps less surprising when it is borne in mind that the judge had found on the evidence that: (a) the Wordless Mark had become distinctive of Lidl through use of the Word with Text; (b) that the Tesco Signs would call the Mark with Text to mind, and (c) and that it is common ground that Lidl have a reputation for low prices. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 6:28 am
When browsing Case C‑97/12 P, Louis Vuitton Malletier v OHIM, a 15 May ruling of Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) on registrability of an illustration of a lock for goods which either did or didn't have locks, he noticed that some of the cases cited in the CJEU's judgment had odd-looking citations for reference purposes. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 2:30 am
Paragraph 4(c)(i) of the Policy is a complete defense if before any notice of the dispute the respondent is using the domain name in connection with a bona fide offering of goods or services. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 7:15 am
Claim on dilution rely on Section 29(4)(c). [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 4:07 am
A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the involved goods/services. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 3:54 am
A TTAB judge once told me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods/services. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 1:00 am
Here's some good news from Tunisia: from 16 October the Mediterranean-facing North African republic will be a fully-fledged participant in the Madrid Protocol scheme for the international registration of trade marks. [read post]
20 Oct 2021, 3:43 am
A TTAB judge once told me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) case 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the goods/services. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 4:01 am
A TTAB judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the involved goods/services. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 3:39 am
See if you can guess how they came out, based on looking at the marks and the involved goods and services. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:10 am
A TTAB Administrative Trademark Judge once said to me that one can predict the outcome of a Section 2(d) appeal 95% of the time just by looking at the marks and the involved goods or services. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 3:39 am
" The applicant argued that the goods and services are directed to different audiences through different channels of trade.]In re Michelle Mora, Serial No. 88704761 (April 15, 2021) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 8:36 am
Trump is a good example b/c of all the Trump-branded things, which are very different from TRUMP TOO SMALL. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 1:00 am
The application was opposed under sections 3(1)(b), 3(1)(c) and 3(1)(d) Trade Marks Act 1994. [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 7:30 am
Ltd of Guangzhou, Cancellation No. 92054959 [Petition to cancel a registration for the mark shown below [transliteration: WANG LAO JI] for "processed tea leaves packaged in bags," on the ground of fraud in that a Section 8 Declaration of Use for said registration was fraudulently signed by one Kevin Whang as "Owner" of the mark when he was neither owner of the mark or authorized to practice before the USPTO].February 13, 2014 - 2 PM: In re Nieves & Nieves LLC, Serial… [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:33 am
"The first letter “c” in “century” is pronounced as an “s” would be, and each term is made up of three syllables. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:38 am
The test for determining whether a mark is deceptive under Section 2(a) is as follows: (1) is the term misdescriptive of the character, quality, function, composition or use of the goods? [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 11:03 am
The CJEU stated that European Union law does not preclude the proprietor of a national trademark from opposing the import of identical goods bearing the same trade mark and coming from another Member State, in which said trade mark, which initially belonged to the same proprietor, is currently owned by a third party. [read post]
