Search for: "Mark Connot"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,153
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2014, 7:40 pm
With regard to the comparison of the marks in relationship to the goods, the marks would mean different things to each respective consumer group. [read post]
22 Mar 2014, 8:51 am
Hence, the court has to give a connotation to the ‘injunctions of Islam’ in order to exercise its jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 2:42 am
While the court had acknowledged that Lindt did not use the word sign GOLDBÄREN , it held that the sight of the shape of Lindt's three-dimensional chocolate bears inevitably produced connotations with Haribo's bears, which could result in a dilution of Haribo's trade mark rights. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 3:17 am
The marks are thus more similar than dissimilar in appearance and convey a similar connotation: a series or pack of high quality supplements. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 8:40 am
To find in favor of likelihood of confusion, a court would consider several factors, commonly referred to as the DuPont factors in the federal circuit, including (but not limited to) the following: strength of the prior mark (here, Jameson); similarity of the marks with respect to appearance, sound, connotation, or commercial impression; similarity of the products or services; the intent of Jamieson in adapting its mark; evidence of actual confusion… [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 2:48 pm
Advertising: the advertiser can make the mark more/different. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
However, the Board observed, customers for registrant's goods may view the applied-for mark as an update of the registrant's mark for its "Fruit Candy" line of products.In sum, the Board found the marks to be similar in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:51 pm
However, in ex parte examination with the USPTO the determination of likelihood of confusion commonly focuses on the marks in their entireties with regards to visual similarities, sounds, connotations, and commercial impressions. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:08 am
Hitachi's mark merely adds the word "CROSS," which has no apparent connotation in relation to the involved goods, to the cited mark. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 3:29 am
In short, the marks are similar in sound, appearance, and meaning (with CHAMPION connoting the best or superior services). [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 2:58 am
"Considering the marks in their entireties, we find the marks are very similar in sight, sound, connotation, and overall commercial impression." [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
Mark A. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 3:40 am
Such connotations may also lead to difficulties in securing trade mark registration, though marks which may allude to concepts that may offend some consumers (for example references to genitalia) will generally be registrable, eg DICK AND FANNY.A good name will also match consumer expectations and be memorable (unless it's for pharmaceutical products, in which it will be polysyllabic, unpronounceable and contain at least one X). [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
It found the word "Buffalo" to be the dominant portion of registrant's marks, both because of its prominence as the first word in the mark and because "bucks" has a descriptive connotation in connection with gaming devices.Applicant lamely argued that, in use, the marks are displayed differently, but of course that was irrelevant, since the Board must consider these two standard character marks without reference to any style, color, font size, or other… [read post]
4 Feb 2014, 8:59 am
Thus, wrote the court (at page 13), [E]ven if the distinctions [between the two specimens that] defendants identify were nontrivial, the nature of plaintiffs’ mark, as connoting the signature of a particular, now deceased, person, does not leave much room for a different version of the same person’s signature to be associated with another company. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:22 am
The Board concluded that the marks are sufficiently similar in appearance, sound, meaning, and connotation that confusion is likely to occur.As to the seven registrations submitted by applicant, none of them consist of the words ENDORPHIN or ENDORPHINS alone or with a minimal design element. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 10:44 am
Carl’s mark (no, not Karl Marx! [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:54 am
Applicant maintained that the design portions are sufficient to distinguish the marks, but the Board found that the designs project similar connotations and commercial impressions. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 9:23 pm
” “Skins” can connote images of animal pelts cut away from the body by fur hunters. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 3:02 am
The Board found it premature to decide on the connotation of the cross-design element of the cited mark, and likewise premature to decide whether CODE is the dominant portion of each mark. [read post]
