Search for: "Mark Strong" Results 721 - 740 of 10,799
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2010, 3:07 am by John L. Welch
"Opposer failed to prove the fame of its mark in the USA, but the Board did find it to be a "strong, inherently distinctive mark. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:17 am by John L. Welch
The term "Trinity" reinforces this strong religious symbology. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 11:00 pm
This is important in this case because, as set forth above, the record shows that the Paddington Bear character mark is a strong mark. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 3:39 am
They are likely to perceive "ACT" as the source-identifying portion of applicants' mark, and will assume that ACT brand mouthwash comes from the same source; this is particularly true in light of the fact that opposer sells other products under ACT-formative marks (e.g., ACT TOTAL CARE, ACT ANTICAVITY KIDS, ACT RESTORING).Balancing the relevant duPont, the Board found confusion likely, and it sustained the opposition.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog note:An opposer… [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 12:00 pm
" However, the Board found Applicant's website to be "strong evidence that his mark points uniquely and unmistakably to Paul Mauriat. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 2:14 am by John L. Welch
It seems to me that Opposer would also have to show that its mark is very strong in order to overcome the differences in the marks.Text Copyright John L. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 9:33 pm by Afro Leo
It is notoriously difficult to navigate, with unpredictable weather, high seas, strong winds and turbulent conditions. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 3:26 am
The patent thus is strong evidence that the matter is functional. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 7:10 am by Dave Rein
 Lawyers love these because courts give them strong protection, but marketing tends to cringe at these because they do not tell the consumer anything about the product. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:23 am
In view of the foregoing, we find that Opposer’s mark is a conceptually strong mark that is entitled to the normal scope of protection of an inherently distinctive mark. [read post]
2 May 2023, 8:06 am
" The Board has found the required "something more" when applicant's mark itself made clear that its restaurant specialized in registrant’s type of goods (e.g., GOLDEN GRIDDLE PANCACKE HOUSE), or when the registrant's mark was “a very unique, strong mark” and there was a commercial relationship between the goods and restaurants. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 3:12 am
International Multifoods Corp., 668 F.2d 1234, 212 USPQ 641 (CCPA 1982)] stands for the contrary proposition, and in light of the very large number of restaurants in this country and the great variety in the names associated with those restaurants, the potential consequences of adopting such a principle would be to limit dramatically the number of marks that could be used by producers of foods and beverages.The Board has found the requisite "something more" in cases where: (1) the… [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 3:44 am
" Indeed, the Board observed, it would be unfair to applicant not to consider this evidence.As to the marks, the Board found that BLACK BELT is not a strong mark because it is suggestive: "it conveys the idea of being able to defend oneself or being good at self-defense. [read post]
14 Dec 2017, 8:10 am
 SOLO IPTrade Mark protection in the UK after BrexitBarbara Cookson discusses the recent position papers from IP organizations on Brexit, which mostly are “very demanding and expect the UK's final deal to cover detailed issues on intellectual property”, together with the EUIPO’s recent paper, which seems to read as “a very strong message that it is brand owners responsibility to look after themselves. [read post]
7 Jun 2006, 9:52 am
NSSTA Part 1 - Mark and Pat discuss: NSSTA's leadership; bylaw amendments; and broker relationship initiative. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 10:43 am
There is a strong likelihood of confusion, given the strong visual and phonetic similarity". [read post]
The Board placed emphasis on the place of the use of the mark in arriving and their decision, stating that there was strong evidence suggesting that Standard Hotels in the United States despite documentation referring to advertisements and promotional campaigns targeting EU customers. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 4:17 am
" Go see Mark Bennett's Blawg Review #199.It's a crime he didn't host last year; he'd be a strong contender for Blawg Review of the Year 2008, too. [read post]