Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 721 - 740
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2020, 9:15 am
In December 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in a standard essential patent (SEP) appeal involving Ericsson and TCL Communication Technology—a closely watched case that many thought would shed light on what constitutes a FRAND (fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory) offer of a licensing royalty rate relative to standard essential patents (SEPs). [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 3:59 am
The Board is directed to decide the case on the record before it, and that duty may not be delegated to another body.Conclusion: Balancing the relevant du Pont factors, the Board found that VAGISAN is not likely to cause confusion with opposer's mark VAGISIL.Bona Fide Intent to Use: Applicant had not advertised or sold its products in the United States, nor did it have a written marketing plan for the United States. [read post]
31 Oct 2006, 11:43 am
The court then holds that Marks v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 7:53 am
This is the "Catch-22" with any patent application disclosed to the public during the USPTO patent prosecution proceedings in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 2:56 am
But perhaps the Chief Justice’s highest-profile case was United States v. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Dist. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 180 AD3d 1041, 1042 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Dist. v Yonkers Fedn. of Teachers, 180 AD3d 1041, 1042 [2020] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
8 May 2011, 1:13 am
Today marks five months from ACCA’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 8:14 pm
United States Dist. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 3:24 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:10 pm
Thus, as petitioner contends and respondent does not contest, the United States is the only Nation that imposes life without parole sentences on juvenile nonhomicide offenders. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 12:04 am
The Decision in UP v Hungary – Achmea does not apply to ICSID Tribunals On 9 October 2018, the Tribunal in UP and CD Holding Internationale v Hungary (ICSID Case No. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 11:38 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 4:14 am
United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 4:46 am
Creative Arts by Calloway, LLC has filed a complaint (here) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, seeking review under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 2:43 am
There, the CAFC rejected the "reasonable manner" approach:Neither Phillips nor any other opinion of the United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, our predecessor court, or this court has endorsed the T.T.A.B. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 1:36 pm
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. [read post]
19 Feb 2007, 11:33 am
Mark H. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:12 pm
United States, 425 F. [read post]
