Search for: "Marshall v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 4,419
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2017, 6:30 am by Dan Ernst
Far from denying tribal property rights, Justice Marshall's opinion in this case, as explicated by later cases, actually sought to protect tribal title from expropriation by the United States unless the tribes voluntarily consented to the transfer of land.While it is true that the opinion contains offensive and racist language, assumptions, and arguments, it is important not to ignore the ways in which the opinion sought to criticize, as well as justify, conquest and to put a… [read post]
28 May 2014, 4:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The defendant further stated that the judge had a personal dislike for the defendant’s counsel which he demonstrated with the aid of the People v Oberoi in which the defense counsel appeared in front of the judge to conduct a pre-trial suppression hearing. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 6:59 pm by Brian Shiffrin
 The Court of Appeals, in People v Clermont (2013 NY Slip Op 06806 [10/22/13]) the defense suppression motion said defendant had been stopped due to an MVA when no car was involved. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:49 am by Walter Olson
[Beth Schwartzapfel, Marshall Project (“43 states suspend driver’s licenses for unpaid court debts, but only four require a hearing beforehand to determine whether the failure to pay is willful or simply a reflection of poverty. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 11:09 am
In June the MSPB issued a terrible ruling in MacLean v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 8:58 am by Patricia Hughes
Prince Edward Island (PEISC (AD)) (aff’d by the Supreme Court of Canada) and the BC Court of Appeal decision in R. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 5:00 am by Haim Abraham
From 1812 through the mid-20th century, the state immunity doctrine was interpreted in accordance with the Supreme Court case Schooner Exchange v. [read post]
2 Oct 2015, 12:33 pm by Adam Gillette
From 1934 (the year after he graduated from law school) until 1961 (when he was appointed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Justice Marshall worked to end racial discrimination in this country. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:21 am by Kendall Gray
And courts have been doing that since John Marshall's 19th century judo throw--Marbury v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 9:47 am by Lovechilde
  Charles Hamilton Houston, Thurgood Marshall, Robert Carter, Constance Baker Motley, Jack Greenberg, and others litigated all around the country in their efforts to take down Plessy v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:19 am by jpfaff
The standard they adopt appears to be grounded in psychology: citing Withrow v Larkin, they state that a conflict of interest requires recusal if "under a realistic appraisal of psychological tendencies and human weakness, the interest poses such a risk of acutal bias or prejudgment that the practice must be forbidden if the guaranteeof due process is to be adequately implemented. [read post]
23 Feb 2020, 7:17 pm by Colleen Fitzharris, E.D. Mich.
 (Art Credit: Benton Martin)The first instance was United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 12:15 pm by NARF
(CERCLA; Natural Resources Damages) State Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2024.html Tiffany South v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 8:29 am by Andrew Hamm
United States) “The Boldest Moves: When and How to Make Them” (focusing on the power grab in Bush v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 9:23 am
"As always, you can check for updates at the Kennedy v. [read post]