Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,631
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 May 2016, 8:58 am
That's another one of my question marks. [read post]
14 May 2016, 3:34 am
If the Federal Circuit had changed the law on this, the Supreme Court would have heard the case. [read post]
10 May 2016, 7:39 pm
Guest post by Saurabh Vishnubhakat, Associate Professor of Law at the Texas A&M University School of Law. [read post]
8 May 2016, 5:48 am
It is not the purview of trademark law to dictate morality, no matter how appealing or distasteful a mark may be. [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm
Interesting question in 1790; not a particularly predictable one. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 9:01 pm
Cl. 293 (1936), cert. den. 300 U.S. 668 (1937); Hastings v. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 6:07 pm
Supreme Court’s second grant of cert in Fisher v University of Texas at Austin (Dkt No 14-981) were posted prior to the death of Justice Antonin Scalia. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 7:00 am
And, from this perspective, we can also understand how very basic questions of a patent’s stated novelty for the claimed subject matter, and the breadth of the claim, can impact how the eligibility question is answered. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:58 am
That case had questioned whether subject matter eligibility under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:38 pm
It remains to be seen whether the Fourth Circuit will defer to the recent holding of the Federal Circuit, a court which has special subject matter jurisdiction over intellectual property matters. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:38 pm
It remains to be seen whether the Fourth Circuit will defer to the recent holding of the Federal Circuit, a court which has special subject matter jurisdiction over intellectual property matters. [read post]
13 Apr 2016, 5:34 am
Of those five decisions, four necessarily suggest that it does not matter whether the door to the apartment building is locked or unlocked at the time law enforcement officers arrive, because in each of those cases the door was locked. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 5:02 am
Law Sch. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 4:50 am
Feist didn’t answer all questions—even questions about yellow pages: selection of categories enough? [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
The Court denied cert. in the thrice-relisted Ohio v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am
Sandoz, those factual findings should be given deference even though the ultimate determination of definiteness is a question of law. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 12:04 pm
The person who is subject to it has to take certain steps because of the law. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 11:28 pm
Google, there is no more doubt about it: the appeals court decided so, and the Supreme Court denied cert. [read post]
23 Mar 2016, 5:11 am
No matter how you (or I) write it, there is an ideological or “political” tinge to the retroactivity debate. [read post]
22 Mar 2016, 7:16 am
” He also questioned the D.C. [read post]
