Search for: "Matter of Thomas J."
Results 721 - 740
of 2,761
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Thomas Vaughn, the high school principal in the 2015-2016 school year (“principal”),[2] attests that petitioner’s assignment consisted of two periods of mathematics extension laboratory, two periods supervising the ISS room, two “planning periods,”[3] and a “lunch period. [read post]
3 May 2019, 10:07 am
Quebec, which was formally a French colony, still follows the civil law tradition except in matters of public and administrative law, whereas the other provinces and territories follow the common law. [read post]
14 Apr 2019, 7:54 am
Charles J. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 7:05 am
— John Roberts to Henry J. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
There were statements in open court in the cases of O’Brien, Thomas and Bayliff v NGN before Mann J. [read post]
5 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
J. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 11:15 am
After that, Prof Thomas F. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:09 am
At the time of the events involved in this lawsuit, Defendant Simbari Design Architecture, PLLC, an architecture firm of which Defendant Thomas J. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 2:56 am
Christian Jung, Thomas L. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:00 am
(Thomas, J., dissenting) (slip op. at 2). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:12 pm
Ct. 1461, 1486 (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring). [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 7:12 pm
Ct. 1461, 1486 (2018) (Thomas, J., concurring). [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 8:15 am
O’Farrell J concluded (at para 52 of her judgment): “where the clinicians have followed the Mental Capacity Act and good medical practice, there is no dispute with the family of the person who lacks capacity or others interested in his welfare, and no other doubts or concerns have been identified, there is no requirement to bring the matter before the court. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 2:02 pm
Toby J. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:56 am
Nathan Dane's influential 1823 General Abridgment and Digest of American Law similarly treated the Bill of Rights as providing that "the jury in criminal matters must be unanimous. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 9:30 pm
In a recent paper, Thomas B. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 8:12 pm
It is my great pleasure to pass along the announcement of the publication of Joel Slawotsky's excellent article: "The National Security Exception in US-China FDI and Trade: Lessons from Delaware Corporate Law" which appears in the The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law 6(2):228–264.In this new era defined by the re-creation of global regional economic blocks--one centered in China, and the other in the United States, the issue of national interest in the areas where the two… [read post]
