Search for: "Matter of Trader" Results 721 - 740 of 1,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Feb 2010, 12:33 pm by velvel
As was said in the brief filed before Lifland by this writer, the shares could easily have been acquired for victims by SIPC, especially by acquiring them over time as is done by traders in large blocs, had SIPC desired to do so and had it possessed or been willing to obtain the necessary money. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Glynn Lunney: why personalization matters? [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:25 pm
All of these matters are recognised by Sun which says on its website in a "Frequently Asked Questions" section: "Q. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:56 pm
At a basic level if Trader A (the rights holder) puts his product on sale within the EEA his rights would be seen as being exhausted and he could not stop trader B from selling the same within a different country in the EEA. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 8:16 am by Frank Cranmer
b. if there is no direct nexus between the destruction or damage and the matters on which the defence rely as ‘circumstances’, can those matters still be ‘circumstances’ within the meaning of the phrase ‘the destruction or damage and its circumstances’? [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 3:57 am by Broc Romanek
Cox referred to this insider trader, who had been enjoined, as an indifferent violator. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 7:12 am by velvel
February 11, 2010Dear Colleagues: To prepare for a television show with Erin Arvedlund on the SEC Inspector General’s 457 page Report on the SEC’s malfeasance in the Madoff matter, I have identified what I think the most important excerpts from the Report. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 9:28 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Kimberlee Weatherall: Must be frustrating to have judge ignore evidence on which you would rely as a business matter. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:12 pm
No matter how the opponents of the ban try to slice up the advantages of flash orders, they still violate the notion of equal footing in the market place. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:58 pm by Andrew Cross
Therefore, as an introductory matter, all information in this posting is subject to change upon publication of the final rule. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 9:00 am by Richard Goldfarb
  No matter what our hand gestures, though, no one was going to write us a ticket. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:06 am
It goes without saying that a proprietor of an IPR should be able to defend its rights against an infringer and that it would be advantageous in most circumstances to be able to negotiate with an alleged infringer and to have the opportunity to resolve the matter without bringing expensive infringement proceedings. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 6:39 pm
For starters, anti-traders' responses couldn't be mailed-in anymore; and they'd actually have to come after the President's remarks, not before them. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 2:06 am
It goes without saying that a proprietor of an IPR should be able to defend its rights against an infringer and that it would be advantageous in most circumstances to be able to negotiate with an alleged infringer and to have the opportunity to resolve the matter without bringing expensive infringement proceedings. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 3:00 am by LindaMBeale
  Limiting leverage (and taxing it, permanently--not just to make up for TARP losses but because high leverage entails government costs and potential government action in the future, no matter what we say about "no more bailouts) and limiting risk are absolutely necessary. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:40 pm by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
  Contrary to some suggestions that have circulated today, he would not be able to sue for the tort of passing off, as this Twitter account does not constitute a representation in the course of trade by one trader which damages the goodwill of another trader. [read post]