Search for: "Matters v. City of Ames" Results 721 - 740 of 1,574
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by NL
You pointed out that your client did not know who Dr Jackson was but, in these circumstances, I am satisfied the information is reliable. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 7:50 am by NL
You pointed out that your client did not know who Dr Jackson was but, in these circumstances, I am satisfied the information is reliable. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 6:39 am by Rick Hills
In particular, unless SCOTUS grants cert in Metro Taxicab Board v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
The conjoined appeals in Salford City Council v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336, which are due to be heard by this Court later this month, involve possession orders made in different and more common circumstances … Those appeals may therefore provide a more appropriate vehicle for the giving of general guidance. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm by chief
The conjoined appeals in Salford City Council v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336, which are due to be heard by this Court later this month, involve possession orders made in different and more common circumstances … Those appeals may therefore provide a more appropriate vehicle for the giving of general guidance. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The court said that the underlying facts, coupled the absence of charges ever having previously been filed against the teacher during his 21-year career, supported the Commissioner’s determination that the penalty imposed was proportionate to the offenses for which the teacher was found guilty.The authority of an arbitrator to modify the disciplinary penalty proposed by the employer was a significant issue in Communication Workers of Am., Local 1170 v Town of Greece, 85 AD3s… [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 6:17 pm by Ron Coleman
BREAKING: Judge rules against Citi in #trademark suit, refuses preliminary injunction blocking AT&T’s “Thanks” program. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 3:48 pm by Dan
Answer: nothing," posits that the issues in this matter involve a commercial dispute, not IP. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
This is an edited version of a paper given to the City University Forum on “Re-Framing Libel” on 4 November 2010. [read post]