Search for: "May v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc." Results 721 - 740 of 866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2009, 4:06 am
Wal-Mart Stores4th Cir.Reasonableness Not Required For Participation Retaliation ClaimCumbie vs. [read post]
14 May 2009, 5:14 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 340 F.3d 1246 (11th Cir. 2003), a case involving class certification under the Truth in Lending Act (TILA), the district court concluded that consideration of damage awards, in conjunction with the plaintiff’s actual injury, was permissible. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court concluded that Plaintiff failed to sustain her burden for class certification under the standards articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 8:09 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The Court concluded that Plaintiff failed to sustain her burden for class certification under the standards articulated in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
The case is Heimeshoff v Hartford Life & Accident Insurance Co. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc (Dkt No 12-729) In an unpublished opinion, the Second Circuit affirmed a lower court’s decision that the plaintiff’s claim for long-term disability benefits was untimely because she filed her action outside the policy-prescribed, three-year statute of limitations period. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 10:55 am by Greg Mersol
 The Supreme Court emphasized that requirement only two years ago in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:08 pm
In sum, these rulings, and a similarly pro-corporate, anti-litigant ruling in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 10:00 am by Kristen E. Polovoy
More motions to dismiss being granted If ECJ-based (and other food label claims) have a limited shelf life going forward, their end would likely be precipitated not by the content of new FDA ECJ guidance but rather because cases like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 4:43 pm by Steve Matthews
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana. [read post]
27 Aug 2007, 1:26 am
Small Firm's Lawyers Not Waiting for Wal-Mart Fees The Recorder The $172 million Wal-Mart meal-break verdict won by The Furth Firm in 2005 ranks among the top 10 verdicts nationally, but few of the lawyers will be around to celebrate if and when the money arrives. [read post]
The Court’s Decision Plaintiffs’ theory of commonality was rejected by Judge Kessler as identical to the failed theory presented in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]