Search for: "Mays v. Hunter" Results 721 - 740 of 983
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by Adam Baker
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:48 am by Adam Baker
Turning to the second question Binnie J reviewed what was then the leading Canadian case on fundamental breach: Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd. [1989] 1 SCR 426. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 3:05 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit weighed in with Hunter v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:43 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Baseball’s antitrust exemption, first recognized in the United States Supreme Court’s 1922 Federal Baseball Club v. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 4:04 pm by Marie Louise
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Lamps Plus – Failure to show subjective bad faith sinks request for attorneys’ fees for alleged frivolous lawsuit: Mark Hunter v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 1:29 pm by David Cheifetz
In this case, two hunters negligently fired shotguns at about the same time in the same direction. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:33 am
  There are at least four potential outcomes that may result from FDA’s recent actions:  1) a ban on all cheeses made from raw milk, 2) an extension of the 60-day aging period to 90-days or longer depending on evidence from the literature, 3) adoption of a European-type approach with intense regulation of animal health and hygiene during processing, but no aging rule, or 4) no change in the 60-day aging rule in the US. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 7:34 pm
  Table 2 shows some of the major pathogens that may survive in cheese even after aging. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 5:42 pm
Tami Parr of the Pacific Northwest Cheese Association portended regulatory changes that may affect the fate of raw milk cheeses on her blog earlier last month. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:35 am by Adam Wagner
Sign up to free human rights updates by email, Facebook, Twitter or RSS Related posts Protecting child claimants from “fortune hunters and thieves” Detaining and deporting the mentally ill Specialist Mental Health Courts are a good idea which may never happen Filed under: Art. 14 | Anti-Discrimination, Art. 6 | Right to Fair Trial, Mental Health, Social Care Tagged: Seal v UK [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 9:32 am by Richard Goldfarb
  Again, there is no government standard for which onions may be labeled “sweet. [read post]