Search for: "McConnell v State"
Results 721 - 740
of 832
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2022, 2:20 pm
McConnell surely gives her a pass on inconsequential votes like this one. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 5:34 am
And yesterday, the States and the House filed their reply briefs on the motion to expedite. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 12:53 am
02/08/2008
Appellate Ruling in State of New Jersey v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:26 pm
Mitch McConnell Meets with Pot Execs In California, Pitched Need for Cannabis Banking Reform, Market Watch, October 12, 2019. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 12:09 pm
McConnell the amendment should be considered by the full Senate. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 12:53 am
Justice Judith McConnell agreed with the trial court that the state has "taken a scorched-earth, drag-your-feet ... approach to the litigation where it has fought tooth and nail to avoid doing what it voluntarily agreed to do. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 1:26 pm
Mitch McConnell Meets with Pot Execs In California, Pitched Need for Cannabis Banking Reform, Market Watch, October 12, 2019. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 8:21 am
Secretary of State John Kerry. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:05 pm
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:03 am
Third, I disclose that David Souter nearly resigned in protest over Bush v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
Consider last Term’s decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 4:23 am
” At In These Times, James Gray Pope and others look at approaches to “rebuilding labor after the Supreme Court’s … ruling” in Janus v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:45 am
” Sussman v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:49 am
Wade, which Kennedy helped to keep largely intact when it came under a heavy challenge in 1992, and Obergefell v. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 5:11 am
I have also enjoyed working with Bob and Tracy on some projects, including some pro bono amicus briefs in the Supreme Court (including in McConnell v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
McConnell, “Excluding Epidemiological Evidence Under FRE 702,” For The Defense 18 (June 2023) [Castile]. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 2:07 pm
" McConnell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 3:50 am
What California v. [read post]
2 May 2015, 6:22 am
The case, Spokeo v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
”[72] Justice L’Heureux-Dubé, however, did not agree that an expression stated in the positive (i.e., a “significant contributing cause”) meant the same thing as one stated in the negative (i.e., “not a trivial cause”). [read post]
