Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,552
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am
” Last month, United States District Judge Jesse M. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 4:49 am
Also, no decision (not even a preliminary ruling) has come down yet in connection with Motorola Mobility's pursuit of SEP-based injunctive relief against Microsoft in Europe.For both Samsung and Google, today's news is really good news, and it comes at an opportune time.Later today, or first thing tomorrow, the Apple v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
At least in this instance, it places obligations only on the service provider to act within the United States....This case, for some Canadian readers will be reminiscent of the Canadian Federal Court decision in eBay Canada Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 1:00 pm
For additional information regarding data breach notification statutes enacted in the United States and worldwide, please refer to BakerHostetler’s State-by-State Survey of Data Breach Notification Laws; Key Issues in State Data Breach Notification Laws; and International Compendium of Data Privacy Laws, all of which are available at www.dataprivacymonitor.com. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:36 pm
But in 2010 the 6th Circuit, in United States v Warshak, ruled that email was protected by the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 10:43 pm
I recommend to the people I know in the Apple fan community who would like to see draconian remedies imposed on Samsung for Apple's competitive gain beyond what is warranted by its inventive contributions to the state of the art (I just borrowed language from a Federal Circuit ruling recently quoted by Judge Koh in Apple v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 12:03 pm
United States Racquetball Association allowed a 1202 claim to proceed to trial based on garden variety infringement of a photograph. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 1:42 am
The most valuable one of Apple's three software patents-in-suit in the first case (most of the damages there relate to design patents, not software patents), the '915 pinch-to-zoom API patent, has meanwhile been rejected by the United States Patent and Trademark Office and Apple had to file an appeal to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am
But patents protect only an inventive contribution to the state of the art. [read post]
29 Mar 2014, 2:49 am
I'm not going to do the usual preview post listing patents, products etc. before the trial in the second Apple v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 5:34 am
The district court explained the background of the patent as follows: In 1998, United States patent number 5,729,659 (the '659 patent) was issued to Jerry L. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 4:56 am
Section 798(a)(3) states that[w]hoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information ... concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:03 am
The Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:14 pm
There is also a domestic challenge to treaty power in the United States, embodied in Bond v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 9:12 am
Here, it wiretapped a United States citizen on United States soil in an apparent attempt to obtain information about members of the Ethiopian diaspora who have been critical of their former government. [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 10:03 am
I heard some grumbles because the organization was initially named the “United States Trademark Association” and therefore the formation question could be misinterpreted. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
In U.S. federal court, it's not impossible but certainly rather difficult to satisfy the eBay v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 4:00 am
The percentage of workers in unions in the United States was higher than in Canada until around the 1960s, at which time a stark divergence occurred. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 7:08 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
