Search for: "Miller v. Doe"
Results 721 - 740
of 3,671
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2019, 3:56 pm
The UK Supreme Court’s decision in R (on the application of Miller) v. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 6:30 am
’” What does this mean, concretely, for law? [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 12:59 pm
Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:17 am
Robles, involving whether the accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act applies to websites and apps; Miller v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
Whitford, a case The Lost History does not cite.) [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 3:51 pm
” (Citing Kuhn v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:20 am
State v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:16 am
STATE V. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 7:56 am
§ 9003(e)(1)(A); Miller v. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 8:12 am
Simmons (joined by Stevens), rendering minors ineligible for the death sentence, was bolstered by its 2012 ruling in Miller v. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
English law, which we are an acknowledged expert in, does not easily provide for judicial review of the executive. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
Its decision in R (on the application of Miller) v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 11:41 pm
DOT v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
Nonetheless, there have been many interesting and important constitutional questions raised in the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom over the last few days in the joint appeals of R (on the application of Miller) v The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v Advocate General for Scotland, in which the applicants seek a declaration of illegality in relation to Parliament’s most recent prorogation. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 1:25 am
Straightforward legal principles asking about justification, having analysed, objectively, the impact. 11:34: Michael Fordham QC starts his submissions on behalf of the Counsel General for Wales 11:34: Ronan Lavery QC closes his submissions. 11:31: Ronan Lavery QC returns to the fact that Parliament does have an obligation to protect NI’s interests and that is the essence of the submissions – this is not merely a political game. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 4:46 am
“In order for evidence to qualify as ‘documentary,’ it must be unambiguous, authentic, and undeniable” (Granada Condominium III Assn. v Palomino, 78 AD3d 996, 996-997 [2010]; see Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 86 [2010]). [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 11:19 am
” The Lake Norconian Club Foundation v. [read post]
