Search for: "Mills v. United States" Results 721 - 740 of 898
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm by Ellie Rudnick
Maine Governor Janet Mills called the suit the “latest, expected salvo in an unprecedented campaign to pressure the State of Maine to ignore the Constitution and abandon the rule of law. [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:11 am
  The United States does not recognize these rights, with one very limited exception, and restricts the copyright incentive to economic rewards. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 4:17 am by Peter Mahler
In Weingarten v Kopelowitz, 2020 NY Slip Op 51260(U) [Sup Ct Kings County 2020], the plaintiff brought suit individually and derivatively on behalf of a Delaware LLC in which he held a one-third membership agreement after he was terminated as property manager of multi-unit rental properties in Tennessee owned indirectly by the LLC. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am by Dennis Crouch
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, et al., No. 15-1314 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 12:47 pm by The Legal Blog
Girdharilal Yadav (2004) 6 SCC 325; State of Maharashtra v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by Eric Claeys
All the same, as the Chief Justice recognized in another case about overruling precedent—Citizens United v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 11:03 am
In the United States, clinical psychology has become a significant focus of the discipline, largely separate from psychological research. [read post]
22 Apr 2010, 7:22 am by PaulKostro
It was enacted “to protect the confidential sources of the press as well as information so obtained by reporters and other news media representatives to the greatest extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States and that of the State of New Jersey. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:05 am by Pace Law School Library
:  the failure of safe drinking waterenforcement in the United States. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 7:05 am
In response to public protests, state officials justified the additional pollution by concluding the project will create more jobs and "increase the diversity and security of oil supplies to the Midwestern United States. [read post]