Search for: "Needles v. Needles"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,142
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2017, 1:42 pm
The Ninth Circuit’s recent opinion in Washington v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 2:41 pm
Term Limits v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 2:44 pm
ATP Tour: The Little Case That Could On May 8, 2014 the Delaware Supreme Court upheld a “loser pays” fee-shifting bylaw for a Delaware non-stock corporation in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 11:57 am
In macabre detail, the Eighth Circuit issued a March 6, 2018 decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 9:40 am
Neither side came away with a clear victory in the Court’s decision in Alabama Department of Revenue v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 11:22 am
Camp v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 6:11 am
Shatzer, Graham/Sullivan, McDonald, and American Needle) Robert Barnes focuses on the “newer” Justices and their impacts on this Term. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:37 am
Ramirez, who grew up in the South Bronx, was the founding Vice President of the ACLU of Puerto Rico and in his early years in that position investigated allegations of human rights abuses directed at homeless drug users participating in federally funded needle exchange programs. [read post]
13 Feb 2008, 5:00 pm
And in Texas v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 4:15 am
., Philips v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 11:20 am
Evans and Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 8:39 am
Several powerful lawmakers, including Senate President Thomas V. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
Atkins v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 3:59 pm
The Fourth Circuit Court in Richmond, VA, is exploring the case of Emmett v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm
The scope of the NFL’s licensing rights has been a subject of recent litigation (notably in the Supreme Court case American Needle, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2016, 1:37 pm
Supreme Court precedent in Arizona v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 3:59 am
In Upsolve v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 12:59 pm
Hedgepath v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
[It] discusses TechSearch, L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 1:18 am
He submitted that lack of minimal creativity, in any event, cannot be protected under the Act, as it lacked originality, in view of the EBC v Modak judgment. [read post]
