Search for: "Orange County Supreme Court" Results 721 - 740 of 1,380
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am by Abbott & Kindermann
(G049691; 236 Cal.App.4th 1341; Orange County Superior Court; 30-2012-00593557.) [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 5:19 pm by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 6:31 pm
AbbottChief of PoliceWest Orange Police DepartmentWest Orange, N.J. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 5:49 pm by Jeralyn
All known stores in these two South Orange County cities are now the subject of federal enforcement actions. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:03 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
See here, here for example (the latter case is being considered by the California Supreme Court, so we may see some major pronouncement this year). [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm by James Yang
As an Orange County Patent Attorney, I serve Orange County, Irvine, Los Angeles, San Diego and surrounding cities. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 8:44 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
  For district courts in Houston, county-wide information and court- and judge-specific information and notices are available on the Harris County District Court website. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 8:50 am by Nassiri Law
More Blog Entries: Age Discrimination in Tech Job Postings, July 6, 2014, Orange County Employment Lawyer Blog California’s Top Employment Law Mistakes, Oct. 26, 2013, Orange County Employment Lawyer Blog   [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:17 am by Nassiri Law
Later in the summer, the California Supreme Court opened the door for more plaintiffs to gain class action certification in contractor misclassification disputes. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Phil Dixon
The defendant was charged with and convicted of dogfighting and related offenses in Orange County. (1) He argued the evidence was insufficient to establish his specific intent to keep the dogs for purposes of fighting. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 1:32 pm by Jeffrey Lichtman
  [The New Jersey Supreme Court] has described this doctrine as an integral part of due process that is often extrapolated from or implied in other constitutional guarantees. [read post]