Search for: "P. v. Mai"
Results 721 - 740
of 19,907
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 1:52 am
The Court also accepted that the first instance judge’s reasoning in relation to Slipper damage was arguably mistaken; it may be that Slipper damages remain irrecoverable unless the initial communication is actionable by common law standards [63]. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 1:54 pm
In Tereshchenko v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:58 am
Amgen v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
The facts of the case On 21 November 2023, Sir Anthony Mann of the London High Court handed down a judgment in the case of Emotional Perception AI Ltd v Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2023] EWHC 2948 (Ch). [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 9:48 am
The first being that Sign Ordinance Section 156.162(P) prohibited electronic signs of any size, in which the display may change periodically. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 5:23 am
Trendily Furniture, LLC v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
St-Sauveur se dit atterré à l’idée de « tout perdre », mais son propre témoignage au sujet des deux bâtiments annexés, et le rapport P-9 de l’évaluateur agréé Claude Gauthier, font réaliser que le terrain, situé en zone résidentielle, vaut probablement plus cher une fois débarrassé de bâtiments vétustes, inutilisables, lugubres et… [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:30 am
Yet, Phillips may claim that it would not matter. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
First, the Court is competent to review restrictive measures adopted under Article 29 TEU, within the meaning of the CJEU case law (i.e., measures of individual scope of application; see Ben Ali v Council, para. 145) in the annulment procedure (Article 263(4) TFEU). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
You may wonder how this is possible, given that Barrie died in 1937—over 86 years ago. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:10 am
However, the assessment of the inherent distinctive character of a sign must be made only by reference to the goods and services and the perception of the sign in question (Henkel v OHIM, C-456/01 P at para. 35). [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
As we have witnessedin the last few months with Syria, Germany, and other EU states, the unlikely weaponmay have been enacted again" (Greenhill, 2010, p. 26)4.In traditional military coercion, the aim is to achieve political goals "on the cheap".Weak actors could also use mass migration to achieve political goals that would be utterlyunattainable through traditional military means or, in a more limited number of cases, forpowerful actors to achieve aims wherein the use of… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
He heard the application on 25 May 2023 and reserved judgment, which he gave on 28 July 2023. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:09 am
The lever for advancing the matter will be the posting by PDVSA of a largely token bond of $10,000 in order to obtain the new share certificate (Petróleos de Venezuela, S.A. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 3:07 pm
Jeffrey P. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 8:41 am
The AIA provides that a party may join an existing IPR if it “properly files a petition under section 311. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 7:46 am
Une telle flexibilité, notamment dans le contexte de la pénurie de la main-d’œuvre, a nécessairement une grande valeur. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 12:47 pm
Marcus and Imran discussed legal challenges that may arise when implementing AI into a business and how to address those challenges. [read post]
