Search for: "PENN v. PENN."
Results 721 - 740
of 1,882
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
The style of the case is, Bige, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:23 pm
The court concluded the Special Referee correctly determined that Columbia Venture’s lack of reasonable investment-backed expectations coupled with the legitimate and substantial health and safety-related bases for the County’s floodplain development restrictions outweighed Columbia Venture’s economic injury, and under Penn Central, no regulatory taking occurred Columbia Venture, LLC v Richland County, 2015 WL 4751034 (SC 8/12/2015)Filed under: Current Caselaw,… [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Penn National. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 8:18 am
Not since Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Today, for reasons both technological and political, there is an increasing divergence and growing conflict between U.S. and foreign laws that compel, and prohibit, production of data in response to governmental surveillance directives.[1][2] Major U.S. telecommunications and Internet providers[3] face escalating pressure from foreign governments, asserting foreign law, to require production of data stored by the providers in the United States, in ways that violate U.S. law.[4] At the… [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 5:41 am
Lawprof Paul Gowder tried to hijack the post, reflecting his need to reread Matthews v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 7:30 pm
Co. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:16 pm
That is precisely what happened in Fields v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 11:41 am
In his book titled Segregation: The Inner Conflict in the South, Warren interviews black and white people around the South in the wake of Brown v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:30 pm
But based on two dialogue sessions organized this spring in Alberta, Canada by the Penn Program on Regulation (PPR), it appears that many stakeholders of the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) favor an input-based answer to the question of regulatory excellence. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
The Commonwealth Court addressed this issue in the case of Penn State University v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 8:36 am
The Commonwealth Court addressed this issue in the case of Penn State University v. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:14 pm
TM clerk was very different from patent counterparts—technical expertise v. experts in delicate art of distinguishing and classifying signs and words. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 9:06 am
Garcia v. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 2:37 pm
CTRL-C and CTRL-V are considered sacred symbols. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 9:11 am
Jurisdictional Boundaries of Prior Use within Britain: An analysis of the House of Lords’ judgments in Roebuck v Stirling (1774) and Brown v Annandale (1842)Barbara Henry (University of Hertfordshire)Commentator | Eva Hemmungs Wirtén (Linköping University, Sweden) Two cases, 60 years apart. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 2:18 pm
Ambiguity between how much of the discourse in A2K is targeted at patent v. copyright. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 12:02 pm
Q: Garcia v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 9:03 am
Cariou v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:45 am
Lopez, Gonzalez v. [read post]
