Search for: "Paine v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 6,736
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States that granting a person use and derivative use immunity from prosecution enables government officials to lawfully and literally compel (on pain of contempt) self-incriminating statements from a witness. [read post]
10 Jul 2007, 4:58 am
Last Thursday however, the Third Department affirmed a dismissal of the class action suit finding that the plaintiff failed to state a cause of action in Baron v Pfizer, Inc., 2007 NY Slip Op 05813. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 4:37 am by Amy Howe
  In two of the new cases, United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  To the contrary, Trump’s brief goes to pains to sharply distinguish the “office under” language in the Positions Clause from the slightly different “officer of the United States” terminology in the “Officials Clause,” and tries to exploit that difference in order to argue that the latter, middle clause must describe a narrower class of offices than the former. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:20 am by Steven Cohen
The appellant filed a products liability claim in district court stating that a drug manufactured by the appellees caused her to have chronic pain. [read post]
The Ocean Wind 1 and 2 project cancellations also followed the filing of County of Cape May v. [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
3 Jul 2024, 12:32 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"Generally, a claimant who voluntarily withdraws from the labor market by retiring is not entitled to workers' compensation benefits unless the claimant's disability caused or contributed to the retirement" (Matter of Losquadro v Nassau County Police Dept., 225 AD3d 1083, 1084 [3d Dept 2024] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; accord Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048-1049 [3d Dept 2024]; Matter of… [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
The appeal by way of case stated in the “Twitter joke” case (Chambers v DPP) has been allowed. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 2:46 pm
Earlier today, Bobby Chesney posted the surprising indictment in United States v. [read post]